On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:39 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
autosync of sources: Need a machine running "fink selfupdate-cvs;
fink fetch-all; rsync to server" every 10 minutes or something
similar. Any ideas there? OpenDarwin is going to help with this. Only
need one machine to do that, the other
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 05:39 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Particularly never add a "-RC1" or something similar just "because you
can use epoch to correct it later". It is better to not package that
version, or if you must, fudge the version so it works with dpkg's
system. If you see a strange v
On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 11:38 AM, Justin Hallett wrote:
okay %e is great thanks...and I agree, but I think it will be used, I
have
a number of rc pkgs.
It is almost good that it is not documented. It really should not be
used except in grave circumstances. If you have to fudge version
nu
I am currently testing my fink mirror patch. It adds a "fink" mirror
that is intended to hold a mirror of every source tarball, so there
will no longer be any breaking URLs.
It uses a preference:
1) Check fink mirrors first
2) Check closest mirrors first (mixes fink and whatever mirror set, or
On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 02:38 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
okay %e is great thanks...and I agree, but I think it will be used, I
have
a number of rc pkgs.
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes there is: %e (see PkgVersion.pm, line 136).
Cause I think it'd be nice to have if we start using
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Max Horn wrote:
> Ah
>
>
> I wasn't aware that we had resolved all the issues with this? And
> that we agreed to release it to unstable... The discussion on this on
> fink-devel must have slipped by me. For example, I completly missed
> all the responses to Masanori's worr
Ah
I wasn't aware that we had resolved all the issues with this? And
that we agreed to release it to unstable... The discussion on this on
fink-devel must have slipped by me. For example, I completly missed
all the responses to Masanori's worries regarding the GTK+ 2.0 <->
2.2 + XFree86 4
okay %e is great thanks...and I agree, but I think it will be used, I have
a number of rc pkgs.
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Yes there is: %e (see PkgVersion.pm, line 136).
>
>>Cause I think it'd be nice to have if we start using Epoch more and more.
>
>Well, epochs should only be used as
At 12:26 Uhr -0700 03.03.2003, Justin Hallett wrote:
hehe np, I was just listing them for dmalloc to document or to have record
of it for others... is there an Epoch version percent expantion var?
Yes there is: %e (see PkgVersion.pm, line 136).
Cause I think it'd be nice to have if we start using
hehe np, I was just listing them for dmalloc to document or to have record
of it for others... is there an Epoch version percent expantion var?
Cause I think it'd be nice to have if we start using Epoch more and more.
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Yup yup, it still needs to be properly do
At 11:29 Uhr -0700 03.03.2003, Justin Hallett wrote:
since I think i was the first to try and use the new Epoch in fink 0.12, I
think the docs are very limited and completly unclear.
First there should be an example secondly ppl must know to add it to the
Splittoffs as well as the Main pkg dependin
since I think i was the first to try and use the new Epoch in fink 0.12, I
think the docs are very limited and completly unclear.
First there should be an example secondly ppl must know to add it to the
Splittoffs as well as the Main pkg depending on the shlibs should have
Depends: %N-shlibs (= :%
12 matches
Mail list logo
