Re: [Fink-devel] Bug in fink news RSS 1.0 feed

2003-11-27 Thread Ben Hines
On Nov 27, 2003, at 5:34 PM, Tim Pritlove wrote: The most obvious bug and the one that made me do the bug report was that the elements lack a unique resource URI and that the element misses it's basic element: the RDF sequence of resource URIs. In addition, all referenced URLs get forwarded

[Fink-devel] Openssl097 vs openssl 0.9.6

2003-11-27 Thread Dean Takemori
Is there a reason for having both openssl-* and openssl097* packages in the 10.3 distribution? I'm using the Fink 0.6.2 .pkg release with OS 10.3.1 + Xcode Update 2003-11-03 and the openssl (0.9.6j-1) package fails to compile. No problem says I, since the openssl097 .info file says it provides t

Re: [Fink-devel] Bug in fink news RSS 1.0 feed

2003-11-27 Thread Tim Pritlove
Ben, "read it" I should. I did. I read the RSS 1.0 standard, not the output of a validator that doesn't get the point and doesn't test the necessary RDF structure completely. And I read the output of my RSS reader and it is confused by fink's feed. I don't really understand why nobody understa

Re: [Fink-devel] Shared Headers support?

2003-11-27 Thread Max Horn
Am Donnerstag, 27.11.03 um 08:11 Uhr schrieb Daniel Macks: Okay, another idea. Consider for major versions N: fooN.info: Package: fooN Version: N.0.0 SplitOff: << Package: foo-dev Provides: fooN-dev << The fooN packages are empty (like Type: bundle). By having all th

Re: [Fink-devel] current fink HEAD

2003-11-27 Thread TheSin
yeah I know about those bits :P I think almost everyone is scared of the dep engine too :) it's been on the todo list for a few years now :) Mostly just make sure you can inject.pl for new and for upgrades...and maybe just run a selfupdate or something to make sure it run but normally it's not

Re: [Fink-devel] another test failure

2003-11-27 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Michael" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> Odd. $$PWD works for me but $PWD doesn't. Is this using fink's make? Michael> Anyhow, both are dodgy. I just wanted something to make it absolute. $(PWD) Michael> seems better. I'll switch it to that. The difference

Re: [Fink-devel] current fink HEAD

2003-11-27 Thread Benjamin Reed
Michael G Schwern wrote: Anyhow, I should probably start doing some manual testing until we get better coverage. What do most people do? If you do a real make install (ie, inject) and do a "fink index" you will generally find out right away whether changes are broken in obvious ways. I often d

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages "the" and "regina" in Fink

2003-11-27 Thread Benjamin Reed
Kyle Moffett wrote: Does anybody else have any comments, or should we suggest that porters avoid the usage of DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in packages? I just spent an hour and a half trying to debug my application to figure out why it crashed on one machine and not another. The answer was that I was tryin

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Installing librep-dev-0.16.2-11 failed

2003-11-27 Thread jfm
On Nov 27, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: David Orlovich wrote: - Trying to install rep.m4 in /sw/src/root-librep-0.16.2-11/usr/share/aclocal; if this fails, install it manually in a suitable location

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Installing librep-dev-0.16.2-11 failed

2003-11-27 Thread David Orlovich
Hello again Fink users and Martin - thanks for the help - I really appreciate it. I've inserted notes after Martin's comments below: On 27/11/2003, at 11:20 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: David Orlovich wrote: Hi Fink users. I'm trying to install bundle-gnome and it fails while installing librep-

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Installing librep-dev-0.16.2-11 failed

2003-11-27 Thread Martin Costabel
David Orlovich wrote: Hi Fink users. I'm trying to install bundle-gnome and it fails while installing librep-dev-0.16.2-11. I've seaerched the archives and found a reference to a similar situation. In that case, it is recommended to move /usr/local out of the way (which I tried) but it still

Re: [Fink-devel] current fink HEAD

2003-11-27 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:47:38AM -0700, TheSin wrote: > HEAD is currently broke because of Michael's changes again, @BASEPATH@ > needs to be set someplace to find $config_file Sorry. I fixed it. Just forgot to load the Fink::Config in fink. > As a side note, does Michael test his changes be

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/t 00compile.t,1.1,1.2

2003-11-27 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:49:34AM -0800, Daniel Macks wrote: > First, check for Test::More and say where to find it. That module is > essential module for t/ but didn't become part of the perl core until > perl5.8.0. Good idea. Should get around to getting Test::More into bootstrap. I've improv

Re: [Fink-devel] Shared Headers support?

2003-11-27 Thread Daniel Macks
Okay, another idea. Consider for major versions N: fooN.info: Package: fooN Version: N.0.0 SplitOff: << Package: foo-dev Provides: fooN-dev << The fooN packages are empty (like Type: bundle). By having all the major versions of the -dev be arranged as different %v of

Re: [Fink-devel] Latest HEAD fink fails to install

2003-11-27 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:11:46AM +0100, Darian Lanx wrote: > Can't call method "param" on an undefined value at > /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Engine.pm line 120. My bad. Forgot to load the Fink::Config object. Fixed now. -- Michael G Schwern[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/

Re: [Fink-devel] another test failure

2003-11-27 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:47:09PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote: > OK, on 10.3 (where I haven't tested before) I can report that the earlier > failures aren't occurring, presumably because you fixed them. There is > another problem, though: I can't run "make test" at all unless I first > edit th