TheSin wrote:
I completely agree with this, I don't think two pkgs should have the
same pkg in it, could end up with bad problems, specially in the
bindist...I suppose this is more of a pkg bug..
There are other packages that do this. python has python21, python22,
and python23 as parents. IIRC
OK, I corrected my error, restored some accidentally wiped out changes,
and in particular put buildconflicts back into Validation.pm.
-- Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be mor
we don't want to docu it yet, it still needs more testing before we
want to use it.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-Dec-03, at 4:44 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
On the other hand, the point of the exercise was to make sure that
ever
TheSin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why was buildconflicts removed?
> ---
> TS
Sorry, that was an accident; looks like I started from an old version of
Validation.pm by mistake. I"ll fix it.
On the other hand, the point of the exercise was to make sure that
everything in Validation.pm is in the
Folks, we need a few updates in the packaging manual. Section 5.4 on scripts
is out of date; could somebody who is familiar with the current script
rules please revise it? (just send the text here if you don't know how
do the xml edits)
Also, I detected some amiguities between Validation.pm and
I've never looked at the PDB so your right but then it could reuse the
sub to get this info. And add a show parent in the PDB for users, but
then it could be in the devel module.
so how about it? I'm willing to get the module started and move some
commands to it, if someone will right the rele
fink showparent libavcodec-shlibs would show it's in ffmpeg. then they
could copy over that info file.
And of course for us with like 100 pkgs well I don't need to explain
the devel usage i think.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-D
I completely agree with this, I don't think two pkgs should have the
same pkg in it, could end up with bad problems, specially in the
bindist...I suppose this is more of a pkg bug..
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-Dec-03, at 3:44 PM
Am Dienstag, 09.12.03 um 21:59 Uhr schrieb TheSin:
I think this is true for at least parent, as I explained before I have
many users ask where a pkg is, like in the case of mplayer which
depends on libavcodec which is in ffmpeg. Fink will say it can't find
the depend on libavcodec, and then pp
Am Dienstag, 09.12.03 um 21:56 Uhr schrieb TheSin:
no this isn't true as JFM showed us...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]$ fink splitoffs netpbm-bin netpbm10
Information about 1923 packages read in 2 seconds.
Information about 27 shared libraries read in 0 seconds.
netpbm-bin is a child, it's parent netpbm
just noticed i posted the wrong example here it is.
netpbm has 2 children:
-> netpbm-shlibs
-> netpbm-bin
netpbm10 has 2 children:
-> netpbm10-shlibs
-> netpbm-bin
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-Dec-03
no this isn't true as JFM showed us...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]$ fink splitoffs netpbm-bin netpbm10
Information about 1923 packages read in 2 seconds.
Information about 27 shared libraries read in 0 seconds.
netpbm-bin is a child, it's parent netpbm10 has 2 children:
-> netpbm10-shlibs
I think this is true for at least parent, as I explained before I have
many users ask where a pkg is, like in the case of mplayer which
depends on libavcodec which is in ffmpeg. Fink will say it can't find
the depend on libavcodec, and then ppl don't know where to find this.
Now if it's not i
Am Dienstag, 09.12.03 um 07:45 Uhr schrieb D. Höhn:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
TheSin wrote:
| I just added these two commands to fink HEAD, dmalloc should be
adding
| them to the man pages for me tomorrow, please provide feedback.
|
| fink splits -> returns a list of chil
If I understand your message correctly, you do not believe that we are
ready for a release.
Please let me know when we are ready.
-- Dave
TheSin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a few features should be held out Dave
>
> since we are still discussing on fink splitoffs and fink showpare
Martin:
It will work if you move local/main to be the last item in your Trees line
in fink.conf.
-- Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you crea
then just add a .1 to the revision that is what i do.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-Dec-03, at 1:19 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees imp
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is
now, since one of the recent shakeups, the *reverse* order of the
Trees line that is used. If true, I would con
maybe someone will know this better then me.
in get_splitoffs I'm using this
$package = Fink::PkgVersion->match_package($name);
which will return one match to a pkg name
maybe the fault it there since there are two versions of netpbm-bin.
or am I wrong, does it return both and I just don'
I think a few features should be held out Dave
since we are still discussing on fink splitoffs and fink showparent,
I'd leave those out, and there is a bug in the sub get_splitoffs, I
hope to have that fixed but still we should leave it out for now since
it's not documented.
Also could we get
jfm wrote:
It is somewhat less intuitive, yes _ and further was unannounced, and
undocumented,
while this ordering is really an important config tool for users, and
there were several
previous msgs on the lists pointing out its use. So the change
definitely wasn't done
optimally.
Undocumented a
Martin Costabel wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is
now, since one of the recent shakeups, the *reverse* order of the Trees
line that is used. If true, I would consider this a serious b
I plan to release a new version of the package manager, fink-0.18.0, in a
day or two. If you are aware of any bugs in CVS HEAD, please fix them
(or report them) now. If you are planning to add new features to CVS
HEAD, please wait until after the release.
-- Dave
Hello all,
the included info-file works great on my panther.
regards, Beat
#
Package: gsl
Version: 1.4
Revision: 1
Maintainer: Jeffrey Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
Source: ftp://mirrors.rcn.net/pub/sourceware/gsl/%n-%v.tar.gz
Source-MD5: 7513e13525c073dc07e02cc43
Do I have to do anything to get my package to get copied to the mirrors
(ocaml)? It builds fine, but you have to explicitly tell it to go to
the original source URL.
Thanks,
Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
On Dec 9, 2003, at 5:25 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is
now, since one of the recent shakeups,
Not that recent : the introduction of 'fink index'
the *reverse* orde
seems to only show the first match, that isn't good... Glad you caught
this as I'm using this sub in the shlibs code and that could have
caused a huge head ache.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-Dec-03, at 9:13 AM, jfm wrote:
On De
it's tree but version is higher, is if there is a newer version in on
of the included trees it'll prefer it.
plus if you have the old one compiled the deb is still there and it'll
pick it.
but you can do
fink install libxml2-2.5.x-%r and it'll force that one. But you need
the revision. and u
and what happens in this instance? I never thought of this, I'm gonna
test it right now...thanks JF.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-Dec-03, at 9:13 AM, jfm wrote:
netpbm-bin has as parents both netpbm and netpbm10 _
and there may
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is
now, since one of the recent shakeups, the *reverse* order of the Trees
line that is used. If true, I would consider this a serious bug.
--
Martin
---
On Dec 9, 2003, at 7:45 AM, D. Höhn wrote:
There can be many children but only _one_ parent. Is that correct?
netpbm-bin has as parents both netpbm and netpbm10 _
and there may be a couple more such examples.
Jean-Francois
---
This SF.net ema
I wanted to roll back from unstable's "libxml2" at version 2.6.x, to
stable's "libxml2" at version 2.5.x so that I can build Perl's
XML::LibXML again (which isn't compatible with 2.6.x yet).
I thought I could just copy the stable .info file to my local/main
area, and since I have local first, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David R. Morrison wrote:
| I screamed and complained before, and I'll do it again.
|
I didn't realise that you meant to express your disapproval. You asked
me a qustion in the first mail you sent. I apologise for not getting it
right :)
| You can'
I screamed and complained before, and I'll do it again.
You can't and shouldn't remove things.
-- Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Beamis wrote:
|/sw/lib/libguile.dylib(libguile.12.3.0.dylib-master.o) definition of
|_environ
|ld: Undefined symbols:
|_lt_dlpreload_default
It is trying to link against libguile.12.dylib from guile-1.6.x, either
remove the guile16
Alexander,
Creation/editing can be preserved as it is, I'm not thinking to
touch that at all.
In the short term I'll concentrate on input of content; cleanup
what's already there and add a special section for beginners
to download, install and troubleshoot fink.
But at the same time, for the
Hi, I got this address from the fink Guile page,
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/guile
I've been trying to update a fink installation on my Mac running OS X
10.2.8, but it stops with errors when compiling guile. I have tried
fink reinstall fink and I have tried installing Guile sep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
In oder to check distfiles mirrors and their usability i was wondering
if we should attach a little script which does what is described here:
http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/LinuxMag/col53.html
[suggested title: ``Checking your website's health,
Hasani Huey wrote:
[]
ld: table of contents for archive: /sw/lib/libintl.a is out of date;
rerun ranlib(1) (can't load from it)
Just do it as it says :-)
FAQ#5.10 http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php#toc-out-of-date
--
Martin
---
Th
The .info GCC: field does not appear to be documented anywhere.
Someone who's got the Official Word on it should probably add it to
the Packaging Manual.
dan
--
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks
---
This SF.net e
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Ben Hines wrote:
>
> On Dec 8, 2003, at 9:45 PM, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
>
> > Actually, the maintainer removed them. I'll put them back.
> >
>
> No, he didn't remove them, they were added by someone else, and he
> didn't notice.
What I meant is that he removed them from HIS
On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
On Dec 8, 2003, at 10:57 PM, D. Höhn wrote:
Geezes you people are picky ;)
"I will remove the data contained in teh two mentioned flders so that
it
does not have to be checked anymore" better? ;)
see yas
Yes i still use phpmyadmin. Leave them.
An
On Dec 8, 2003, at 9:45 PM, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
Actually, the maintainer removed them. I'll put them back.
No, he didn't remove them, they were added by someone else, and he
didn't notice.
-Ben
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: S
On Dec 8, 2003, at 10:57 PM, D. Höhn wrote:
Geezes you people are picky ;)
"I will remove the data contained in teh two mentioned flders so that
it
does not have to be checked anymore" better? ;)
see yas
Yes i still use phpmyadmin. Leave them.
-Ben
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
D. Höhn wrote:
| Darian Lanx wrote:
|
| | Hello
| |
| | I am a bit on the "cleaning trip".
| | Is the subdirectory pws or phpmyadmin in the web module still in use?
| | Thank you
| |
| | -d
| |
|
| Just a follow up to my own mail. Since no one scr
On Dec 9, 2003, at 1:49 AM, D. Höhn wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Darian Lanx wrote:
| Hello
|
| I am a bit on the "cleaning trip".
| Is the subdirectory pws or phpmyadmin in the web module still in use?
| Thank you
|
| -d
|
Just a follow up to my own mail. Since no on
46 matches
Mail list logo
