hi
I just did run into the same problem as Colin.
(ibrep-shlibs-0.16.2-11 failed because of missing symbols Dl_info)
After fink selfupdate, I tried to update-all packages
Reading your suggestion, I upgraded to XCode 1.1 (otherwise, I thought
my dev tools are ok)
but the error is still there.
I
Ben Hines wrote:
On Jan 8, 2004, at 7:24 PM, Max Horn wrote:
We can't get anything into 0.6.2 - that's a fixed release :-).
Not totally correct as you know, we do have an 'current' dir which we
can throw packages into which point release stable users can access. For
occasionally totally broken
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I have been trying for ages to suggest to use 'current' for replacing
packages which are known to be broken. There are several packages in
0.6.2 that are known not to work on 10.3 and IMHO it absolutely stinks
that after almost 3 months
Am 11.01.2004 um 00:21 schrieb Ben Hines:
Fink should be able to realize what this is:
WARNING: Unable to parse the line libbonobo2.info in
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/libbonobo2.info.
WARNING: Unable to parse the line === in
David R. Morrison wrote:
Fink 0.6.2 was released on 17 November 2003, less than two months ago.
You are right, my first message to fink-devel where I asked that qt3 in
the bindist for 10.3 should be replaced by something that actually works
on 10.3 dates from 6 November, not much more than 2
On Jan 9, 2004, at 10:16 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
The install script for freetype2 moves lib/libfreetype.la into a
lib/freetype2/ directory, but that doesn't get installed from %i into
%p so there appears to be a problem with that package.
It gets installed into %p when you install the
This could be easily tested with a disk image, for example. Mount a
read/write disk image, get info, choose 'ignore permissions' (looks
like it is default) and try to install fink. It does indeed fail:
This first test is designed to die, so please ignore the error
message on the next line.
#
If there is anything we don't need it is to slow down indexing. I don't
care how much cleaner it makes the code, we need to index constantly.
It needs to be fast.
-Ben
On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Switch to an object-oriented and consistent way of handling source
tarballs.
Am 11.01.2004 um 23:31 schrieb Ben Hines:
If there is anything we don't need it is to slow down indexing. I
don't care how much cleaner it makes the code, we need to index
constantly. It needs to be fast.
-Ben
On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Switch to an object-oriented and
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:53:41PM +0100, Max Horn wrote:
Am 11.01.2004 um 23:31 schrieb Ben Hines:
On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Switch to an object-oriented and consistent way of handling source
tarballs. Seems to slow down indexing quite a bit and make fink.db up
If
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 06:28:49PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:53:41PM +0100, Max Horn wrote:
Am 11.01.2004 um 23:31 schrieb Ben Hines:
On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Switch to an object-oriented and consistent way of handling source
11 matches
Mail list logo
