Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[snip]

> I have been trying for ages to suggest to use 'current' for replacing 
> packages which are known to be broken. There are several packages in 
> 0.6.2 that are known not to work on 10.3 and IMHO it absolutely stinks 
> that after almost 3 months 

Fink 0.6.2 was released on 17 November 2003, less than two months ago.

> we still have to tell people every few days: 
> Well, you know, if you look at page 3 of the news on Fink's home page, 
> it tells you that not all binary packages of 0.6.2 are actually working 
> on Panther; the thing you are trying to run (qt3, for example) is one of 
> the exceptions; you have the choice between compiling them yourself (but 
> for qt3, this will take 3 hours and usually does not work the first time 
> you try) and getting them from bbrauns inofficial unstable bindist.
> 

As I have mentioned on this list before, I have been working steadily to
implement this for quite a while.  To be sure that the dependencies don't
get messed up, I've been working on getting the updates into stable and
only then creating a kind of "supplementary bindist" which will be put
into 0.6.2-current (but only for 10.3 users).

The release of the supplementary bindist should be less than a week away
at this point.

  -- Dave



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to