TheSin wrote:
this seems to be a 10.2 or 10.2-gcc3.3 file as all my 10.3 pms have
pm581s
Then maybe you forgot to commit your version in 10.3/stable?
--
Martin
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 08:20:28PM +1300, Nigel Stanger wrote:
> Darian Lanx at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus:
>
> > On a second note I think (%type[nox] "") is not such a hot syntax,
>
> It just confuses me. Is that supposed to be an "equals" constraint? If so,
> why not just say so and make it
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:14:10PM +1100, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2004, at 4:33 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:53:09AM +1100, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
> >>
> >>I discovered that fink did not like this. If I add a "#!/bin/sh" to
> >>the
> >>first line, it saves the script t
On 12 Feb 2004, at 4:33 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:53:09AM +1100, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
In writing the InstallScript for a new package I wanted to be able to
fold long lines, to make it more readable. ie. have:
/usr/bin/install -m 755 common/fink/emacsen-install \
this seems to be a 10.2 or 10.2-gcc3.3 file as all my 10.3 pms have
pm581s, and I no longer support 10.2 or 10.2-gcc3.3 as the maintainer
field indicates. So if someone wants to fix it or backport my versions
for 10.3 feel free.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, tr
It was suggested at [EMAIL PROTECTED] that I
contact the package maintainer for date-manip-pm in regards to the
following make error:
/bin/mkdir -p /sw/src/date-manip-pm-5.40-2
gzip -dc /sw/src/DateManip-5.40.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf -
/usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL PERL=/usr/bin/perl PREFIX=/sw
INS
In writing the InstallScript for a new package I wanted to be able to
fold long lines, to make it more readable. ie. have:
/usr/bin/install -m 755 -d %i/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install
/usr/bin/install -m 755 common/fink/emacsen-install \
%i/lib/emacsen-common/packa
Daniel Macks wrote:
Package: foo%type[nox]
Type: nox (-nox "") # one variant has "-nox", the other ""
Depends: (%type[nox] "") x11
CompileScript: <<
if [ %type[nox] == "-nox" ]; then
./configure %c --without-x11
else
./configure %c --with-x11
fi
make
<<
I
On Feb 10, 2004, at 7:57 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Having looked at this some more, it looks like there is no bug except
perhaps in "fink list", apt decided that installing perl560-core and
all the
-pm560's was a reasonable way to solve the 'Depends: libwww-pm' in
gnucash
:( apt is right, looking
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:35:42PM +0100, David H. wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
>
>
> Ok I will play the advocate of "easiness" now.
Bring it on.
> >Early in the -devel variants discussions, it was decided that we
> >should overload the Type: field. So we just need a way to get at that
> >info.
"Peter O'Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> > Does the same bug show up in 0.18.2? in CVS HEAD?
> >
>
> Having looked at this some more, it looks like there is no bug except
> perhaps in "fink list", apt decided that installing perl560-core and all the
> -pm560'
Daniel Macks wrote:
It we want to go programming-language-style:
Depends: %type_perl_version == 5.8.1 && thing-pm
Depends: %type_nox == -nox || x11
It we want to be a bit more linguistic/thought-process oriented:
Depends: %type_perl_version = 5.8.1 ? thing-pm
Actually, I think the part tha
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0500, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> >It we want to go programming-language-style:
> >
> > Depends: %type_perl_version == 5.8.1 && thing-pm
> > Depends: %type_nox == -nox || x11
> >
> >It we want to be a bit more linguistic/thought-process orie
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Darian Lanx wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> >Daniel Macks wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> Yes, I vote for a solution in Perl as well, yet I still think that the
> syntax is simply bad. Bad as in too complicated for the common or novice
> packager to understand. Ma
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 07:27:52AM -0500, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to maybe do something as a preprocessor
> stage or something like that rather than adding even more new and
> unusual syntax?
>
> Since you can have carriage returns in depends and stuff now (at least
Christian Schaffner wrote:
>
> On 11.02.2004, at 06:19, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
> > Thank you for updating python23-socket-ssl.
> >
> > However, it also only depends upon db42 and not db42 | db42-ssl.
>
> Revision -23 (in fink unstable now) BuildDepends on db42-ssl only now.
> Which seems correct t
After having worked with a colleague yesterday for two hours to make
his newly installed Fink do anything reasonable and having had to give
ugly advice to him and to newbies on the lists of the type "sudo touch
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xlib.h", "sudo rm /sw/lib/libintl.la" or "sudo
ln -s /usr/loc
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
The simpler version of the idea is just a simple string equality test:
Depends: (%type_perl_version 5.8.1) thing-pm
Since you can have carriage returns in depends and
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
The simpler version of the idea is just a simple string equality test:
Depends: (%type_perl_version 5.8.1) thing-pm
Since you can have carriage returns in depends and stuff now (at least I
t
o I like this one RangerRick.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 11-Feb-04, at 5:27 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
The simpler version of the idea is just a s
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
The simpler version of the idea is just a simple string equality test:
Depends: (%type_perl_version 5.8.1) thing-pm
Depends: (X%type_nox X) x11
Either [the two strings in parens] are the same (so the package is
k
On 11.02.2004, at 06:19, Blair Zajac wrote:
Thank you for updating python23-socket-ssl.
However, it also only depends upon db42 and not db42 | db42-ssl.
Revision -23 (in fink unstable now) BuildDepends on db42-ssl only now.
Which seems correct to me. Please report back to Jeffrey Whitaker if
yo
Dear Fink Developers
Most of the package maintainers now have upgraded the dependencies on
berkeley db from db4 or db41 to db42 in the fink 10.3 unstable tree.
Thanks a lot! I think it would be great if the last 5 remaining
packages could be updated as well. They are:
bind9, Matthew Flanagan <
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> The simpler version of the idea is just a simple string equality test:
>
> Depends: (%type_perl_version 5.8.1) thing-pm
> Depends: (X%type_nox X) x11
>
> Either [the two strings in parens] are the same (so the package is
> kep
24 matches
Mail list logo
