Hi,
I've a problem with system-tetex. I'm the maintainer of pyx-py*
packages and it happens quite often to reinstall this packages (to
update them). Every time I try to do it I get the following error
message:
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink install pyx-py23
Information about 2804 packages read in
Hi,
I was validating a package that I maintain and I got the following
warning:
Warning: Patch file appears to contain a hardcoded /sw.
(pyx-py23.patch)
Trying to replace /sw strings with %p/ result in an error. Which is
the right sintax?
Thanks,
Andrea.
---
Andrea Riciputi
Science is
On 23 Feb 2004, at 8:07 PM, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
Hi,
I was validating a package that I maintain and I got the following
warning:
Warning: Patch file appears to contain a hardcoded /sw.
(pyx-py23.patch)
Trying to replace /sw strings with %p/ result in an error. Which
is the right sintax?
Andrea Riciputi wrote:
[]
Package: pyx-py23
Version: 0.5.1
Revision: 1
Depends: python23|python23-nox, tetex-base | system-tetex, ghostscript
system-tetex already Provides tetex-base, so you don't need this
alternative. I suspect this is where the problem comes from.
| ghostscript-nox |
Martin,
It is not an omission that system-tetex does not provide tetex-dev.
One of the differences between Gerben Wierda's teTeX distribution and the
fink one is that in fink, we build libkpathsea as a shared library, whereas
it is only a static library in Wierda's distribution.
(This may
Uhm... I'm getting a little bit confused here. Linking the kpathsea
library is exactly what I do with PyX, I don't have tetex-dev installed
(only system-tetex) and I've not seen any problem during compiling and
installing process. Could you explain this a little further?
Thanks,
David R. Morrison wrote:
Martin,
It is not an omission that system-tetex does not provide tetex-dev.
One of the differences between Gerben Wierda's teTeX distribution and the
fink one is that in fink, we build libkpathsea as a shared library, whereas
it is only a static library in Wierda's
Sorry but I don't understand. As far as I can understand I need this
alternative in the case the user has tetex installed via Fink and not
via Gerben's i-Installer.
Am I wrong?
Andrea.
On 23 Feb 2004, at 14:35, Martin Costabel wrote:
Package: pyx-py23
Version: 0.5.1
Revision: 1
Depends:
If your link line has -lkpathsea, then a user who has tetex-dev installed
will get a link to libkpathsea.dylib, whereas a user with system-tetex
installed will get a link to libkpathsea.a . (The darwin linker prefers
the shared version whenever it can find it.)
-- Dave
Hi Darian,
On Feb 23, 2004, at 1:32 AM, Darian Lanx wrote:
Index: rsync
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/fink/mirror/rsync,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -d -r1.9 -r1.10
--- rsync 24 Jan 2004 18:30:59
Andrea Riciputi wrote:
Sorry but I don't understand. As far as I can understand I need this
alternative in the case the user has tetex installed via Fink and not
via Gerben's i-Installer.
Am I wrong?
IMHO yes. Since system-tetex Provides tetex-base, you don't need to
mention it there. The
Begin forwarded message:
From: d0k [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: February 22, 2004 7:50:21 AM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-users] Re: [Repost] xmms no plugins or visualisation or general preferences after
Ok, I'm gonna try this way right now. Just a question to fink crew: Why keep
the not
12 matches
Mail list logo
