I don't know who to contact, but it won't compile; after going through a lot, it gives a whole string of errors and then gives up;
up until then, it seemed fine.
/sw/include/png.h:952: error: parse error before `*' token
/sw/include/png.h:953: error: parse error before `*' token
The maintainer for postgresql is on vacation this week, so it may be a while
before he responds.
But let me suggest, since you seem to have analyzed the problem very nicely,
that you might try to figure out how the fink package should be modified
and provided a proposed new info file and/or new
Hi,
The latest mmtk (mmtk-2.3.2-1) fails to build because netcdf is not in
the dependencies list, I think it should be a BuildDepends. I am not
sure if netcdf-shlibs and/or netcdf-bin are also needed. Could that be
fixed in cvs?
Thanks,
- Koen.
I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week.
If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are
*not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them
from that tree.
Thanks,
Dave
Baba Yoshihiko has made progress on the internationalization of the
Fink documentation and believes that the multilingual pages for the FAQ
and Documentation sections can be brought online in March, with others
to follow. I am therefore requesting a freeze on ALL changes to these
sections
David R. Morrison wrote:
I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week.
If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which are
*not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove them
from that tree.
And what I would have said the first
Hi Dave,
On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
I plan to start creating a binary release for 10.3 in about a week.
If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which
are
*not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove
them
from that
Hi Remi.
Sure, removing the dlcompat dependencies is one of the things which needs to
be done.
In some cases, this has already been done in the unstable tree, but not the
stable tree. So it's a bit unclear whether one should create a new stable
version, or move the current unstable version to
The xfree86-base package and friends are not in the 10.3 tree at all (which
is how things will stay).
In the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree, it seems we have version -16 in stable and version
-18 in unstable. Does -18 fix the problem you mention? Should it be moved
to stable?
-- Dave
From: Alexander K.
Looking at a recent thread where this came up, I ran the same command
as what was reported, with find from findutils-4.1.20-2 in 10.3
unstable:
$ find . -name mbox -ls
find: ./.gnupg: Permission denied
39118630 -rw--- 1 hansen hansen 0 Feb 25 08:58
On Feb 27, 2004, at 9:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
If you are aware of any of your packages in the 10.3/stable tree which
are
*not* suitable for binary release, please either fix them or remove
them
from that tree.
The stable version of findutils has a known bug, where it reports all
file
Hi,
I think I'm going to go through all the perlmods in stable and unstable 10.3
tonight (~13 hours from now) and ensure that they say 'Depends: foo-pm581 |
foo-pm560' for the 10.3 tree. This is to ensure that apt does not needlessly
install perl560-core.
It will mean a whole bunch of revision
gnome-python and hence, gramps need to be removed from stable since
they aren't compliant with the python policy. The versions in unstable;
gramps, gnome-python2, pytgtk2-py23, pygtk2-py22 need to be moved to
stable. I have good reports from gramps users which depends heavily on
the pygtk and
I've been playing around with packages which don't currently build
prebound libraries and found that in the majority of cases where
libtool is used, calling libtool with -no-undefined will work--provided
the dependencies are prebound, of course. This can usually be achieved
by adding
Hi:
I've gotten several requests to move a couple of my packages (eg: molmol, a molecular graphics display program) to the stable branch. Is this a decision I should make unilaterally (based on user feedback) or is there a more formalized procedure?
Thanks for any advice in advance.
Bill Scott
15 matches
Mail list logo
