[EMAIL PROTECTED] committed:
> Log Message:
> eden update of patch script to deal with trivial change in makefile
>===
> RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/eden.info,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> retrieving r
fink install octave-forge gives:
mkoctfile -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 -v deref.cc
g++ -c -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.53
-I/sw/include/octave-2.1.53/octave -I/sw/include -g -O2
-DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 deref.cc -o deref.o
g++ -bundle -bundle_loader /sw/bin/octave-2.1.53 -o deref.oct dere
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:01:39PM -0500, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2004, at 11:22 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> >Package building currently happens in %p/src/%f and %p/src/root-%f.
> >Would it be bad to move those two directories into a %p/src/build
> >directory, and have a fink.conf varia
Daniel Macks wrote:
Package building currently happens in %p/src/%f and %p/src/root-%f.
Would it be bad to move those two directories into a %p/src/build
directory, and have a fink.conf variable that allows the user to
specify another arbitrary location? These are really temp things that
can get l
Package building currently happens in %p/src/%f and %p/src/root-%f.
Would it be bad to move those two directories into a %p/src/build
directory, and have a fink.conf variable that allows the user to
specify another arbitrary location? These are really temp things that
can get large, so one could co
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:23:48PM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: Okay,
Vasi and I have gotten the lame -dev and dependency mess cleaned up in
10.3, and I cleaned up the atk1 BDOnly mess in 10.3. Should 10.2-gcc3
get the same treatment, or is that tree not going into the bindist?
dan
--
Daniel Ma
