On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:23:48PM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: Okay, Vasi and I have gotten the lame -dev and dependency mess cleaned up in 10.3, and I cleaned up the atk1 BDOnly mess in 10.3. Should 10.2-gcc3 get the same treatment, or is that tree not going into the bindist?
dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
