I have an SSL dependent package (dcqui-qt-ssl) that I've set to conflict
with the non-ssl variant and I have problems having them replace each
other. Dcgui-qt(-ssl) is dependent on dclib0(-ssl) which has an shlibs
splitoff. For dcgui-qt and dclib0(-shlibs), the SSL variant
conflicts/replaces
Would it be a good idea to switch over to use Perl 5.8.5 instead of 5.8.4 in
Fink before too much work is invested in 5.8.4?
Here's what's new in 5.8.5:
http://search.cpan.org/~nwclark/perl-5.8.5/pod/perl585delta.pod
Blair
---
This SF.Net email
Thanks a lot for %a working again !
On Jul 19, 2004, at 8:20 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
An idea that has been kicked around on #fink and is a Features tracker
request is MD5 for patchfiles. This is for end-user convenience (avoid
getting .info and .patch out-of-sync if pulling random CVS revisions)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
jfm wrote:
snip
|
| There are probably 2 different issues: one is that in some cases it may
| be clearer or more convenient to use several different 'patchfiles' , with
| very distinct roles _ so a 'PatchFile' field might have to be plural _ ;
|
David H. wrote:
jfm wrote:
snip
|
| There are probably 2 different issues: one is that in some cases it may
| be clearer or more convenient to use several different 'patchfiles' ,
with
| very distinct roles _ so a 'PatchFile' field might have to be plural _ ;
| the
Actually this is one thing I
Blair Zajac wrote:
Would it be a good idea to switch over to use Perl 5.8.5 instead of
5.8.4 in Fink before too much work is invested in 5.8.4?
What do you mean?
The question is, which Version of Perl will Apple ship? Conservative as
they seem, I guess it will be 5.8.4
So fink itself needs to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Benjamin Reed wrote:
| David H. wrote:
|
| jfm wrote:
|
| snip
| |
| | There are probably 2 different issues: one is that in some cases it may
| | be clearer or more convenient to use several different 'patchfiles'
| , with
| | very distinct roles
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:02:49PM +0200, David H. wrote:
Benjamin Reed wrote:
| David H. wrote:
| jfm wrote:
| |
| | There are probably 2 different issues: one is that in some
| | cases it may be clearer or more convenient to use several
| | different 'patchfiles', with very distinct
Hi Folks:
I've already discovered that maintaining several packages requires
constant vigilance with respect to software updates. Is there an
automated way to monitor a program's web site for version changes to
software that might then email me and awaken me from my seemingly
ever-increasing
I sign up for freshmeat.net updates. Not all projects are there but it
helps allot.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 20-Jul-04, at 9:09 PM, William Scott wrote:
Hi Folks:
I've already discovered that maintaining several packages
10 matches
Mail list logo
