Re: [Fink-devel] Questions about libncurses5w and readline5

2005-02-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 6, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: 1 - Would it be possible to move libncurses5w to 10.3 stable? I need it in a package for additional feature. I will move it most likely on Monday, if there are no objections. There may be one small

Re: [Fink-devel] Questions about libncurses5w and readline5

2005-02-06 Thread TheSin
I'll fix it for you and send you a patch --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 6-Feb-05, at 1:05 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 6, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: 1 - Would it be

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

2005-02-06 Thread TheSin
On 6-Feb-05, at 3:43 PM, Max Horn wrote: The whole discussion is not new of course -- this was discussed years ago. My suggestion back then was to add an explicit RuntimeDepends field for this, and migrate over to that. I don't really see the point of this, it's poorly packaged programs that

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

2005-02-06 Thread Max Horn
Am 06.02.2005 um 23:56 schrieb TheSin: On 6-Feb-05, at 3:43 PM, Max Horn wrote: The whole discussion is not new of course -- this was discussed years ago. My suggestion back then was to add an explicit RuntimeDepends field for this, and migrate over to that. I don't really see the point of

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

2005-02-06 Thread Max Horn
To clarify this once more (Justin just left IRC when I talked to him about this right now, it seems I am touching the feelings of some people here): The Depends field *always* implied both a install time and a compile time dependency. This has been so from day 1 of Fink's existence. It has

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

2005-02-06 Thread TheSin
Yet an other Depends lines, fink is good cause it easy to pkg with you even said that, how easy will it be once we have Info2: three Dep lines (which isn't needed BTW). Anyhow I'm tired of being the only one to push work on, maintain, update this branch. I've talked about this with drm,

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

2005-02-06 Thread TheSin
BTW cause I suck at trying to communicate this way... The subject line Proposed Policy Change. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 6-Feb-05, at 4:22 PM, Max Horn wrote: Maybe this was silently changed during my absence. OK, but then

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

2005-02-06 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 6, 2005, at 6:22 PM, Max Horn wrote: To clarify this once more (Justin just left IRC when I talked to him about this right now, it seems I am touching the feelings of some people here): The Depends field *always* implied both a install time

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

2005-02-06 Thread Daniel Macks
Just want to lay out some ofthe technical issues we've kicked around on #fink. It seems like there are two workable solutions here if we are going to be removing -shlibs pkgs from the Depends field: 1. Add the new {SHLIB_DEPS} token to the Depends field. 2. Switch to Info3, and implement

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

2005-02-06 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: Just want to lay out some ofthe technical issues we've kicked around on #fink. It seems like there are two workable solutions here if we are going to be removing -shlibs pkgs from the Depends field: 1. Add the new {SHLIB_DEPS} token to the Depends field. 2. Switch to Info3,