This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or is
it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Mike S
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of
Hi Mike and all,
On 20/02/2005, at 7:31 PM, Michael wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or
is it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Not at all a stupid question I was going to ask the same thing (in
relation to the
Tony Arnold wrote:
Hi Mike and all,
On 20/02/2005, at 7:31 PM, Michael wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or
is it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Not at all a stupid question I was going to ask the same thing (in
relation
On 20 Feb 2005, at 01:44, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
./configure --prefix=/sw
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether
Ok, now I have a new error. I installed a fresh copy of XDarwin,
figuring that it was something I did to that directory, now the package
builds fine, but dpkg fails with:
(Reading database ... 11260 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking gtk+2 (from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael wrote:
| Not at all a stupid question I was going to ask the same thing (in
| relation to the fontconfig2-dev packages). I understand that it forces
| libraries/executables to link against a specific version of a library
| (i.e. in the case of
Tony Arnold wrote:
OK, that's really good to know - I guess what I'd also like to know is
when is this static library situation appropriate? To be honest, I'd
rather build a full fontconfig2 2.2.9x package (dynamic libraries and
all). Is there any reason I shouldn't?
If I recall correctly, the
From: Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Fink-devel] gtk+2
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 02:46:42 -0800
Ok, now I have a new error. I installed a fresh copy of XDarwin,
figuring that it was something I did to that directory, now the package
builds fine,
On Feb 20, 2005, at 4:53 AM, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
On 20 Feb 2005, at 01:44, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
./configure --prefix=/sw
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
On 20 Feb 2005, at 14:58, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Ah---I didn't realize that pybibliographer isn't a Fink package.
There's a couple of things to do:
was that based on something I wrote? It is a fink package isn't it?
1) Check the config.log file in the pybibliographer build directory
to
Ah---I didn't realize that pybibliographer isn't a Fink package.
There's a couple of things to do:
1) Check the config.log file in the pybibliographer build directory
to see what file it can't find.
2) Make sure you've set your environment up as per
On 20 Feb 2005, at 21:07, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
snip
Am I correct in thinking that this means it is trying to use python
form /usr/bin, see line Python='/usr/bin/python' and
configure:1659: found /usr/bin/python
configure:1672: result: /usr/bin/python
configure:1688: checking python
On Feb 20, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Feb 20, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
On 20 Feb 2005, at 21:07, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
snip
Am I correct in thinking that this means it is trying to use
python form /usr/bin, see line Python='/usr/bin/python' and
Sorry to be so slow to respond here: I've only just begun to track down
what's happening.
When I compile this, I have no problem because the python setup script
does not find a value for DISPLAY in the environment, and so reports
cannot test gtk [no DISPLAY]. My first guess was that this
14 matches
Mail list logo
