RLD wrote:
Problem getting binary for esound via apt-get upgrade:
Failed to fetch
file:/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc//sound/
esound_0.2.35-8_darwin-powerpc.deb Size mismatch
This usually indicates that you forgot to run apt-get update first.
--
Martin
David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Here's my take on this licensing issue, for what it's worth.
I think we should explicitly indicate that authors of .info files are
*contributing* those files to the fink project when they submit them for
inclusion in the fink trees. As contributed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Daniel E. Macks wrote:
| David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
|
|Here's my take on this licensing issue, for what it's worth.
|
|I think we should explicitly indicate that authors of .info files are
|*contributing* those files to the fink
How does Debian handle this? They use a similar info/patch system,
right? And I've seen from other issues that debian-legal is very
involved in licensing issues so I'm guessing they've thought this out.
Hanspeter
--
Hanspeter Niederstrasser, Ph.D.Dept. of Cell Biology
On Mar 30, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
But once you filter out the idea (also not copyrightable, see Title
17, Sec. 102(b)), I suspect you'll find that the expression of that
idea is quite limited by the technical and policy requirements of the
info file.
True, but that is not
Trevor Harmon wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
But once you filter out the idea (also not copyrightable, see Title
17, Sec. 102(b)), I suspect you'll find that the expression of that
idea is quite limited by the technical and policy requirements of the
info file.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
When you develop away and you alter an info file, check it into CVs and
then do something like:
fink list --maintainer=Darian
Fink has detected that your package index cache is missing or out of
date, but does not have privileges to modify it.
