Hi everyone,
I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and
have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions
on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is
actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a
need for
I noted an inconsistency between fink and apt-get when working with a
new package I created. I mistakenly had a Depends on X11 in the info
file. Fink accepted that, but when I tried to use the deb to install
on another computer, it complained that it couldn't find X11. I
changed the
Maybe there is a very good explanation for this, but it has me
baffled. I've created a new package that won't build with gcc 4.
So, I put a GCC: 3.3 line in the info file, thinking that this would
allow fink to tell the user he needed to run gcc_select 3.3. But, I
discovered that if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Horton wrote:
| Maybe there is a very good explanation for this, but it has me
| baffled. I've created a new package that won't build with gcc 4. So,
| I put a GCC: 3.3 line in the info file, thinking that this would allow
| fink to tell
On 19 Jun 2005, at 10:15, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Horton wrote:
| Maybe there is a very good explanation for this, but it has me
| baffled. I've created a new package that won't build with gcc
4. So,
| I put a GCC: 3.3 line in the info
Kevin Horton wrote:
I noted an inconsistency between fink and apt-get when working with a
new package I created. I mistakenly had a Depends on X11 in the info
file. Fink accepted that, but when I tried to use the deb to install
on another computer, it complained that it couldn't find X11.
On 19 Jun 2005, at 12:17, Martin Costabel wrote:
Kevin Horton wrote:
I noted an inconsistency between fink and apt-get when working
with a new package I created. I mistakenly had a Depends on X11
in the info file. Fink accepted that, but when I tried to use
the deb to install on
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have
finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the
list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually
included in the base system. Given this, is there
