Re: [Fink-devel] PyObjC 2.1 package in the tracker

2008-07-03 Thread Vincent Beffara
(i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server ... An acceptable method (that has been used by some packages) is to get the diff to

Re: [Fink-devel] PyObjC 2.1 package in the tracker

2008-07-03 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Thursday 03 July 2008 09:36:20 Vincent Beffara wrote: (i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server ... An acceptable

Re: [Fink-devel] PyObjC 2.1 package in the tracker

2008-07-03 Thread Vincent Beffara
(i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server ... An acceptable method (that has been used by some packages) is to

Re: [Fink-devel] PyObjC 2.1 package in the tracker

2008-07-03 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: On Thursday 03 July 2008 09:36:20 Vincent Beffara wrote: (i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server ... An

Re: [Fink-devel] openmotif4 vs fink

2008-07-03 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 03 Jul 2008, at 03:19, Jack Howarth wrote: Do you mean that you have the MacOSForge 2.2.3 release of Xorg installed? No _ fink's xorg pkg. Any evidence that MacOSForge's might build on 10.4 ?? (I'd give it a try then ) JF

Re: [Fink-devel] PyObjC 2.1 package in the tracker

2008-07-03 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 03:36:20PM +0200, Vincent Beffara wrote: (i) ship a base tarball that is close to the SVN trunk, and make a patch script that calls SVN to catch up to a prescribed revision number. The base tarball might be empty but it's not nice to the server ... An

[Fink-devel] Unable to build freetype2-dev

2008-07-03 Thread Asko Kauppi
Just reporting a problem building freetype2-dev 2.1.4-12 on my machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465). Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)... Seems I'm not the first: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15268.html But there's no solution

Re: [Fink-devel] PyObjC 2.1 package in the tracker

2008-07-03 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:49:25PM +0200, Vincent Beffara wrote: Nevertheless, the general question is interesting in itself. What to do if one wants to follow the SVN version of a package ? Can one assume that the build machine will have network access ? (It kind of has to if only to

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] How to tell mantainers I have a working binary package I can share on Fink?

2008-07-03 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On Tue, July 1, 2008 5:20 pm, Flavio Pane wrote: i.e I am compiling qt3-mac on 10.4 g4, it would be nice if the binary package would be available for other people, how can I send the binary package to the mantainers? t.i.a Since this indirectly involves me (qt3-mac was being built for

Re: [Fink-devel] Unable to build freetype2-dev

2008-07-03 Thread Martin Costabel
Asko Kauppi wrote: Just reporting a problem building freetype2-dev 2.1.4-12 on my machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465). Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)... Seems I'm not the first: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15268.html

Re: [Fink-devel] Unable to build freetype2-dev

2008-07-03 Thread Asko Kauppi
Martin Costabel kirjoitti 3.7.2008 kello 23:24: Asko Kauppi wrote: Just reporting a problem building freetype2-dev 2.1.4-12 on my machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465). Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)... Seems I'm not the first:

[Fink-devel] multiple libiconv linkages

2008-07-03 Thread Jack Howarth
Has anyone noticed that we are getting multiple linkages for libiconv for packages that link against libfontconfig? While fixing up the build on openmotif4, I noticed the same problem that is seen with libgd.2.dylib from gd2... otool -L libgd.dylib libgd.dylib: /sw/lib/libgd.2.dylib