On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:36:07PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Agreed. The package seems mechanically sound, and we're well beyond the
> point
> where the technician-level stuff that I do for validation really matters.
> I'll cc the listed maintainer for the current version, as well.
Gre
The item is fluidsynth:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1871025&group_id=17203&atid=414256
The submitter said that he wasn't able to get the dependency, midishare
http://midishare.sourceforge.net/
to build in a Fink-compliant way. I'd like to see about a second opinio
On Friday 27 June 2008 19:52:20 James Bunton wrote:
> Resending (again) as it didn't seem to make it to the list...
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 03:41:51PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> > Can I get someone to look at
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1885674&group_i
On 7-Jul-08, at 09:44 , Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
> One possible remaining difference might be whether Bernadette and
> Kevin both
> have the same X11 setup, e.g. official components only vs. using the
> macosforge updates.
That is an interesting line of investigation. I am using the
macosfo
Thanks for all the help everybody. I'm not using the display
environment variable and will try running bluefish from xterm and
report my findings.
Bernadette
On Jul 7, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 08:17:03 Kevin Horton wrote:
>> I am the maintainer of th
On Monday 07 July 2008 08:17:03 Kevin Horton wrote:
> I am the maintainer of the bluefish packages. I received the
> following feedback from a user. I tried a fresh fink installation on
> my Intel iMac, running OS X 10.5.4, using the recently released binary
> installer, and then did a "sudo apt-
I am the maintainer of the bluefish packages. I received the
following feedback from a user. I tried a fresh fink installation on
my Intel iMac, running OS X 10.5.4, using the recently released binary
installer, and then did a "sudo apt-get install bluefish" - it works
for me.
I am look
I have a set of svn 1.5.0 packages available for testing in my
experimental cvs directory (experimental/danielj/svn). They validate,
build, and pass their self tests with the exception of one test in svn-
javahl that fails when built as root. I've only used svn-client, which
seems to work fi
On 07/07/2008, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> The current wine package in fink requires ghostscript to build.
> However, it excludes ghostscript-esp from the allowed ghostscript
> variants. Imagemagick requires this ghostscript variant to run so this
> causes problems.
>
Hello
The current wine package in fink requires ghostscript to build.
However, it excludes ghostscript-esp from the allowed ghostscript
variants. Imagemagick requires this ghostscript variant to run so this
causes problems.
Thanks
Michal
10 matches
Mail list logo