[Fink-devel] boost1.35.systempython-1.35.0-5 failed to build

2010-01-14 Thread Sjors Gielen
Hi Martin, I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail to build. The build process says updating 127 packages, and many lines later, the result is 119 targets updated, 4 skipped, 4 failed. The failed packages are: darwin.compile.c++

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink package

2010-01-14 Thread Max Horn
Am 13.01.2010 um 22:19 schrieb Damian Dimmich: fwiw - if the package has been around for 3 years, wouldn't it make sense to put it into stable? First off, I have no idea whether the Fink package has been around for 3 years. Even if it is has been around that long, we don't move packages to

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink package

2010-01-14 Thread Damian Dimmich
Fair enough - what are the criteria for moving packages into stable? I have been using that package for around a year now and it works great :) I'm guessing that maintaining stable is a lot more work - do most people use unstable like me? Damian Max Horn wrote: Am 13.01.2010 um 22:19

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.35.systempython-1.35.0-5 failed to build

2010-01-14 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail to build. The build process says updating 127 packages, and many lines later, the result is 119 targets updated, 4 skipped, 4 failed. The failed packages

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.35.systempython-1.35.0-5 failed to build

2010-01-14 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 14 jan 2010, om 13:11 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail to build. The build process says updating 127 packages, and many lines later, the result

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink package

2010-01-14 Thread Damian Dimmich
fwiw - if the package has been around for 3 years, wouldn't it make sense to put it into stable? Max Horn wrote: Am 12.01.2010 um 21:33 schrieb Alexander Hansen: [...] However, your information is not quite correct. According to

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.35.systempython-1.35.0-5 failed to build

2010-01-14 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op 14 jan 2010, om 13:11 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail to build. The build process says

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.35.systempython-1.35.0-5 failed to build

2010-01-14 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 14 jan 2010, om 15:34 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven: Nah, we started it on -devel, so let's finish it there. I'm just trying to think of ways to make it easier for users to find their issues in the archives. I'm not able to reproduce this error on 10.5/i386. You

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.35.systempython-1.35.0-5 failed to build

2010-01-14 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op 14 jan 2010, om 13:11 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail to build. The

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.35.systempython-1.35.0-5 failed to build

2010-01-14 Thread Martin Costabel
Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: I get the same error on 10.5/i386. Previous revisions of boost1.35.systempython (-2 and -3) built fine, but -5 crashes with the error: 'PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT' was not declared in this scope errors that Sjors also gets. Like Alex, I didn't get the error on

[Fink-devel] Please remove screen from fink

2010-01-14 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello I installed screen 4.0.3-2 on 10.5 and after that sudo would not work in screen. To reproduce: 0) install screen 1) connect through ssh and start screen. Test that sudo works 2) disconnect 3) reconnect and reattach screen sudo now does not work complaining about wrong port or something.

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.35.systempython-1.35.0-5 failed to build

2010-01-14 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Martin Costabel wrote: Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: I get the same error on 10.5/i386. Previous revisions of boost1.35.systempython (-2 and -3) built fine, but -5 crashes with the error: 'PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT' was not declared in this scope errors that Sjors also gets. Like Alex,

Re: [Fink-devel] Please remove screen from fink

2010-01-14 Thread Martin Costabel
Michal Suchanek wrote: [] Apple's version of screen works flawlessly. In addition, the version that comes with MacOSX since 10.4 is the same as the one in Fink, minus the bug. Therefore I second Michal's suggestion. This package has no reason to exist. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] Please remove screen from fink

2010-01-14 Thread Jack Fink
Michal Suchanek wrote: [] Apple's version of screen works flawlessly. In addition, the version that comes with MacOSX since 10.4 is the same as the one in Fink, minus the bug. Therefore I second Michal's suggestion. This package has no reason to exist. -- Martin ...and tmux

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Please remove screen from fink

2010-01-14 Thread William G. Scott
In my case, fink's screen works flawlessly (including sudo), and Apple's is problematic (hangs). I am not using bash. Maybe bash is not playing well with fink's screen... -- Throughout its 18-year history, RSA

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Please remove screen from fink

2010-01-14 Thread Michal Suchanek
2010/1/15 William G. Scott wgsc...@chemistry.ucsc.edu: In my case, fink's screen works flawlessly (including sudo), and Apple's is problematic (hangs).  I am not using bash.  Maybe bash is not playing well with fink's screen... I don't think the shell could affect how sudo works but it could