Davids,
The gmp, libmpfr1 and libmpc2 are reported by the latest
FSF gcc releases as...
checking for the correct version of gmp.h... buggy but acceptable
checking for the correct version of mpfr.h... buggy but acceptable
checking for the correct version of mpc.h... buggy but acceptable
Is the
On May 6, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 5/6/10 3:03 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>> I wonder if this is really necessary; libgettext?-dev seems to depend on
>> gettext-bin anyway.
>
> Probably because many of us don't really know what is
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 06:39:48PM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
> On 06 May 2010, at 15:29, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> Currently 'fink -m' won't complete on the gcc4x packages because
>> of the warnings...
>>
>> Warning: /sw/lib/gcc4.4/lib/libgcc_s.10.4.dylib ends in .dylib but is
>> not o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/6/10 2:44 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 08:20:33PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
>>
>> Am 06.05.2010 um 15:33 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>> [...]
>>
>>> The trailing _STUB isn't handled by the test, which looks for DYLIB
>>> surrounded
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 08:20:33PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 06.05.2010 um 15:33 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
> [...]
>
> > The trailing _STUB isn't handled by the test, which looks for DYLIB
> > surrounded on either side by whitespace.
>
> Indeed. So, should the validator code be augmented to
Am 06.05.2010 um 15:33 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
[...]
> The trailing _STUB isn't handled by the test, which looks for DYLIB
> surrounded on either side by whitespace.
Indeed. So, should the validator code be augmented to handle DYLIB_STUB, too?
It would be easy enough to do.
Cheers,
Max
-
On 06 May 2010, at 15:29, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Currently 'fink -m' won't complete on the gcc4x packages because
> of the warnings...
>
> Warning: /sw/lib/gcc4.4/lib/libgcc_s.10.4.dylib ends in .dylib but
> is not of filetype DYLIB according to otool.
> Warning: /sw/lib/gcc4.4/lib/libgcc_s.10.
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:33:43AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 5/6/10 9:29 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Currently 'fink -m' won't complete on the gcc4x packages because
> > of the warnings...
> >
> > Warning: /sw/lib/gcc4.4/lib/libgcc_s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/6/10 9:29 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Currently 'fink -m' won't complete on the gcc4x packages because
> of the warnings...
>
> Warning: /sw/lib/gcc4.4/lib/libgcc_s.10.4.dylib ends in .dylib but is not of
> filetype DYLIB according to otool.
> W
Currently 'fink -m' won't complete on the gcc4x packages because
of the warnings...
Warning: /sw/lib/gcc4.4/lib/libgcc_s.10.4.dylib ends in .dylib but is not of
filetype DYLIB according to otool.
Warning: /sw/lib/gcc4.4/lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib ends in .dylib but is not of
filetype DYLIB accord
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/6/10 3:03 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> I wonder if this is really necessary; libgettext?-dev seems to depend on
> gettext-bin anyway.
Probably because many of us don't really know what is in each of the
different gettext packages, and when it first got
Hi there,
many packages bdep on libgettext3-dev or libgettext8-dev, but also on in
addition on gettext-bin and/or gettext-tools. I wonder if this is really
necessary; libgettext?-dev seems to depend on gettext-bin anyway. And it
doesn't seem as if packages really (build)depend on gettext-tools
12 matches
Mail list logo
