Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1, cloog-ppl and gcc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/9/10 10:53 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Folks installing the new ppl 0.11.1 packaging should be aware that it *could* cause breakage in pre-existing copies of gcc4x built against ppl 0.10.2. The ppl 0.10.2 to 0.11.x transition represents an

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1, cloog-ppl and gcc

Apologies, fixing today! -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/9/10 10:53 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Folks installing the new ppl 0.11.1 packaging should be aware that it *could* cause breakage in pre-existing copies of gcc4x built against ppl 0.10.2. The ppl 0.10.2 to

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1, cloog-ppl and gcc

Supposedly fixed ppl.info (++%e, --%v) is updated in my experimental/. Please verify this fix. Apologies, fixing today! -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/9/10 10:53 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Folks installing the new ppl 0.11.1 packaging should be aware that it *could*

Re: [Fink-devel] ppl-0.11-1, cloog-ppl and gcc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oops. I swapped around which libs were in which package. I'd say don't call the new-sonamed package ppl0.11, (as per the Conflicts: ppl0.11, Replaces: ppl0.11) but rather ppl9. We like the number to go along with the libversion rather than