Is someone planning to package emacs 23? It's now stable (according
to gnu.org).
Peace
- John
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integra
How do we know who the committers are?
Peace
- John
On May 12, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Monic Polynomial wrote:
> On 12/05/2009, at 09:52, Ebrahim Mayat wrote:
>> I have uploaded (twice recently) an updated info file for a new
>> package submission (ID 2727140) without receiving any
>> acknowledgeme
whole thing I'll have a much better idea of what packages
I would propose to carve it up into (if that makes any sense).
Peace
- John
On Dec 11, 2008, at 2:43 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> John Ridgway wrote:
>> Friends -
>> I am thinking about tackling (once more) the id
Friends -
I am thinking about tackling (once more) the idea of adding TeXLive to
Fink (unless someone is already working on it -- I haven't been
reading the posts recently); but there is a problem standing in my
way. TeXLive is distributed as a .tar.lzma file, and needs lzma to
unpack it.
Friends -
I have done some validating on packages in the tracker, and have added
comments, but I don't have the ability to modify the
attributes...would someone be kind enough to do this for me? Details
follow.
I have also uploaded a new version of gettext-tools that fixes a
problem with
When I tried to do something like this I was shot down; told that the
fink core team was reconsidering the whole issue of "system-"
packages, and that, specifically, system-texlive was NOT going to
happen. I then started an effort to package TeX Live in such a way
as to make it fink-friend
Friends -
I have two outstanding items in the New Packages tracker. I think
I've finally got a version of Poly/ML 5 (polyml5) ready to go, and
Isabelle 2007, which depends on polyml5. They've been sitting there
without action for a while. Would someone be kind enough to test them
out and
On Mar 24, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 2008, at 9:51 PM, John Ridgway wrote:
>
>> Friends -
>> Poly/ML is an implementation of the ML programming language. As
>> such,
>> it has an interpreter which basically just loads the Poly/
Friends -
Poly/ML is an implementation of the ML programming language. As such,
it has an interpreter which basically just loads the Poly/ML library
and runs it. It is possible to have a program that uses the Poly/ML
library but doesn't need the interpreter.
The current version of Poly/ML
So now I'm going to have polyml5 and polyml1-shlibs as a SplitOff?
Peace
- John
On Mar 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 04:43:03PM -0400, John Ridgway wrote:
>> Friends -
>> I have a question. First the background. I have a package t
Friends -
I have a question. First the background. I have a package that I'm
currently working on (polyml5), and it builds a shared library. The
package is at version 5.1, and the shared library that it builds is
libpolyml.1.dylib. This library has the appropriate install-name and
compa
Friends -
I currently have two new packages and two updates in the tracker:
1) sml-mode update to version 4, and I'm volunteering to take over as
maintainer;
2) ProofGeneral update to 3.7 final -- I'm the maintainer and
submitting an upgrade;
3) Isabelle 2007 -- new package; and
4) polyml5 --
The last time you took a hiatus you mooted the idea of documenting the
validation process so that others could do it. Did you get anywhere
with that?
Peace
- John
On Feb 27, 2008, at 8:30 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> I'm busy at work and in the process of moving--I'm not sure when my
When I direct Safari to www.finkproject.org I get the following
undesirable result:
Fatal error: Call to undefined function insert_sub() in
/var/www/www.finkproject.org/header.inc
on line 359
Is this me, or is the site broken?
Peace
- John
Friends -
I am trying to install arch-tla on 10.5, and it depends on patch, and
patch is not in the 10.5 tree. Why not? Is there a simple answer or
a complex one?
Peace
- John
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Micro
On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm probably a month+ away from having Leopard going (I've asked for
> it for Christmas and it's going to be a very busy December and January
> for me), and I don't foresee an Intel box, a
Friends -
The polyml5, isabelle-polyml5, and proofgeneral packages are sitting
on the tracker waiting for something to happen (status is undergoing
validation). I believe it would be a good idea for something to
happen to them.
Peace
- John
Begin forwarded message:
From: John Ridgway
I have a question about how to create a package. There seems to be a
conflict between Fink guidelines and Apple guidelines. I suppose
this is inevitable, but I'd like to know what the group's preferred
resolution is. Here is the problem:
I'm trying to package ANTLRWorks, which is a GUI fr
No, you can't use %p in a patch file. The preferred method,
apparently, is to put something like:
@PREFIX@ in the patch file where you would want %p, then use:
PatchScript: sed 's|@PREFIX@|%p|g' <%a/%n.patch | patch -p1
in your .info file.
See the packaging manual.
Peace
- John
On Sep 18,
On Sep 14, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Vincent Beffara wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
I am finishing up my work on a system-texlive package. It will
also
have tetex-base-texlive and tetex-texmf-texlive packages.
>
> That's great to hear !
>
>>> If I understand well, the latter two build everything from s
On Sep 14, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
> On 14 Sep 2007, at 18:01, John Ridgway wrote:
>
>> I am finishing up my work on a system-texlive package. It will also
>> have tetex-base-texlive and tetex-texmf-texlive packages.
> If I understand we
Friends -
I am finishing up my work on a system-texlive package. It will also
have tetex-base-texlive and tetex-texmf-texlive packages. With these
three packages most, or at least many, packages will be able to work
with TeX Live that currently require teTeX. The current status of
variou
Why is tetex replaced by debian-utils? Is there something subtle I'm
missing?
Peace
- John
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events a
On Aug 2, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> John Ridgway wrote:
>> Friends -
>> I have an interest in seeing that TeX remains available through
>> Fink, and I'm curious as to the status of TeX-related efforts in
>> the Fink project. (I loo
Friends -
I have an interest in seeing that TeX remains available through Fink,
and I'm curious as to the status of TeX-related efforts in the Fink
project. (I looked through the archives of fink-devel with nothing
interesting poking it's head out at me.)
Are there current plans as to what
-approved too
>
> On 8/1/07, John Ridgway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Friends -
>> I'm working on an update to the aspectj port, and I need advice on
>> what to fill in for the License field. The current value is OSI-
>> Approved, which is probably incor
Friends -
I'm working on an update to the aspectj port, and I need advice on
what to fill in for the License field. The current value is OSI-
Approved, which is probably incorrect. AspectJ (TM) is distributed
under the EPL, which is OSI-Approved, but it includes Third Party
Content license
27 matches
Mail list logo
