Hi,
I'm trying to compile mscore. If I'm successful, I plan to make a fink package
(I don't know how to submit a new package yet).
I have a problem.
The configure script says :
checking for QT environment variable QTDIR... yes
checking for QT includes (/sw/include/qt)... yes
checking for QT
Julien Salort wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile mscore. If I'm successful, I plan to make a
fink package (I don't know how to submit a new package yet).
I have a problem.
The configure script says :
checking for QT environment variable QTDIR... yes
checking for QT includes (/sw/include/qt)... yes
Julien Salort wrote:
[]
2/ The following test program *does* compile and *does* execute without errors :
But only while you have X11 running, I guess.
--- conftest.cc
#include qapplication.h
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev,
because it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those
packages are marked BuildDependsOnly. Is it ok if I put those packages
in Depends anyway, or is there another way to solve this?
thanks,
- koen.
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev, because
it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those packages
are marked BuildDependsOnly. Is it ok if I put those packages in
Depends anyway, or is there another way to solve this?
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev,
because it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those
packages are marked BuildDependsOnly. Is it ok if I put those
packages in
On Aug 21, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Hi,
The plplot package that I maintain depends on g77 and tcltk-dev,
because it uses those header files to generate plots. However, those
packages are marked
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Aug 21, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
BuildDependsOnly: false
[]
I think he means that you should ask the maintainers of those packages
to put that line into their packages.
I don't know any more what I meant there, please scratch it. g77 at
least seems
Hi Dave,
Sorry for the late answer. I was away from my email for a week.
I was using both releases 0.14.0 and 0.14.2 and just tried it with
0.15.0 with the same result.
Cheers,
Remi
On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 12:52 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
I have a problem with
I have a problem with BuildDepends since using fink 0.14.X. I have two
packages A and B.
Package A does not Depend/BuildDepend on B, but B has both a Depend and
BuildDepend on A. If I do 'fink build A B' (neither A nor B is
installed), it builds first package A and creates the deb file.
Hi,
I have a problem with BuildDepends since using fink 0.14.X. I have two
packages A and B.
Package A does not Depend/BuildDepend on B, but B has both a Depend and
BuildDepend on A. If I do 'fink build A B' (neither A nor B is
installed), it builds first package A and creates the deb file.
For those of you not watching the fink-commits list: I have added more
BuildDepends entries to many many packages in the past 12 hours. Don't
worry, it's all being done by a script now!
As before, the point is this: if package A depends on package B, and
package B depends on package C, there
12 matches
Mail list logo
