David R. Morrison wrote:
If Martin's observation is correct, a concern arises: How was the binary
being distributed by xfree86.org compiled, and is it still equivalent
to fink's, for the purposes of installing other fink packages?
Dave,
I just wrote about this to the XonX users forum,
At 5:25 Uhr -0700 25.01.2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
However, the static link editor always
produces the same linking as the dynamic linker as long as
none of the dynamic shared libraries define the same sym-
bol. Different linking can occur only when there is more
than one
If Martin's observation is correct, a concern arises: How was the binary
being distributed by xfree86.org compiled, and is it still equivalent
to fink's, for the purposes of installing other fink packages?
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
At 16:48 Uhr +0100 25.01.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
On vendredi, janvier 25, 2002, at 02:14 , Max Horn wrote:
Let us look at it from this point: It all used to work. Then came
XFree86 4.2.0 and it stopped to work. Now, what exactly changed to
make it stop work, I wonder? The only thing that
At 11:10 Uhr -0500 25.01.2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
If Martin's observation is correct, a concern arises: How was the binary
being distributed by xfree86.org compiled, and is it still equivalent
to fink's, for the purposes of installing other fink packages?
I think they compile it just as we
I searched the net and found this:
http://www.perchine.com/dyp/x/motif-faq/part9/faq-doc-24.html
To quote it:
269) Why do I get Error: attempt to add non-widget child dsm to parent?
[Last modified: May 95]
Answer: You're linking your libraries in the wrong order. You must link -lXm
Max: I saw this too. The problem is, we are linking the libs in the
right order. It looks like the linker is not respecting that.
-Jeff
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote:
I searched the net and found this:
http://www.perchine.com/dyp/x/motif-faq/part9/faq-doc-24.html
To quote it:
