Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

2002-11-17 Thread Max Horn
At 17:11 Uhr -0500 17.11.2002, Carsten Klapp wrote: Hi all, I realized today that there are many fink programs which could be prebound right now but aren't, even though the fink dylib automatic prebinding isn't quite ready yet. Using 'otool -L' I made of list of binaries which link ONLY to

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

2002-11-17 Thread Carsten Klapp
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 06:08 pm, Max Horn wrote: The problem with this is that could cause a *lot* of regressions. Feel free to modify your local version of Fink and try, or even better, bootstrap a clean new install using it (verifying that still works with your change). I am

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

2002-11-17 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Fair enough not to commit this to CVS right now, it potentially effects many packages. Anyway I understand a code freeze was declared to get the new version out so no reason why this cannot wait until the proper time can be

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

2002-11-17 Thread Max Horn
At 18:51 Uhr -0500 17.11.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Fair enough not to commit this to CVS right now, it potentially effects many packages. Anyway I understand a code freeze was declared to get the new version out so no reason why

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

2002-11-17 Thread Alexander Strange
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 07:23 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 18:51 Uhr -0500 17.11.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Fair enough not to commit this to CVS right now, it potentially effects many packages. Anyway I understand a code

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

2002-11-17 Thread Benjamin Reed
We could add a SafeReentrantMake field, and then add -j2 if that field says it's safe. If it's going to be manual for every package, why not hand-add it to CompileScript then? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of

Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

2002-11-17 Thread Alexander Strange
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 07:51 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: We could add a SafeReentrantMake field, and then add -j2 if that field says it's safe. If it's going to be manual for every package, why not hand-add it to CompileScript then? So users can more easily disable it. -- Alexander

jobflags was Re: [Fink-devel] Packages which can be prebound right now

2002-11-17 Thread Carsten Klapp
I'm sorry, I didn't intend to start up a 'make' jobs discussion again. :/ A SafeReentrantMake flag in the info file would let the user configure his/her own maximum jobs appropriate for the speed of the machine. Carsten On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 07:51 pm, Benjamin Reed wrote: We