Am 10.12.2004 um 08:11 schrieb D. Höhn:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| Daniel E. Macks wrote:
|
|> David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
|>
|>> I thus propose to rename the GCC field, calling it GCC-ABI instead.
|>
|>
|>
|> Sounds good to me.
|
|
|
Daniel E. Macks wrote:
David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I thus propose to rename the GCC field, calling it GCC-ABI instead.
Sounds good to me.
I don't agree, I think that simply ensuring that the documentation states
the use of this field is to list the g++ ABI version, then we should
David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> I thus propose to rename the GCC field, calling it GCC-ABI instead.
Sounds good to me.
> There is one place in the fink code where the GCC field is tested,
> but that test can easily be rewritten.
Also validator. Three cheers for %obsolete_fields!
