Yeah, that was just a typo.
-Ben
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 05:49 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Shouldn't the order on the pdb web pages be: unstable, stable, 0.5.0a,
0.4.1?
(I think that's what it was for a while yesterday, but now 0.4.1 is
coming
before 0.5.0a).
-- Dave
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 12:28 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
BTW, there is also an HOWTO on how to update the PDB in the scripts
CVS module.
Yes i am seeing if I can do it now. There are a few issues like I
don't have execute access to the finksql script, but I know what it
does anyway so i
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 12:22 PM, Max Horn wrote:
At 12:11 Uhr -0800 08.12.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Very strange, the PDB is now only showing packages that are NOT in the 10.2 tree - ie, the same packages that are on my "not yet moved" list like yorick, r-recommended, gnupg-egd. It is not
At 12:11 Uhr -0800 08.12.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Very strange, the PDB is now only showing packages that are NOT in
the 10.2 tree - ie, the same packages that are on my "not yet
moved" list like yorick, r-recommended, gnupg-egd. It is not showing
any package that is in both trees.
Max will you
The problem was caused by old Fink releases (0.4.0, 0.3.2 etc.) still
being in the DB. Normally this would not be a problem, as the PDB
scripts filter for the release, but in this case the total number was
simply listing all packages.
I guess we might want to change that (and also list.php) to
At 13:46 Uhr -0700 22.10.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
Seems to be showing some shlibs again..
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/section.php/libs
http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/aalib-shlibs
I actually got it running locally based on the scripts/pdb sources,
and I only show 1092 packages as
