I wanted to roll back from unstable's libxml2 at version 2.6.x, to
stable's libxml2 at version 2.5.x so that I can build Perl's
XML::LibXML again (which isn't compatible with 2.6.x yet).
I thought I could just copy the stable .info file to my local/main
area, and since I have local first, it
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is
now, since one of the recent shakeups, the *reverse* order of the Trees
line that is used. If true, I would consider this a serious bug.
--
Martin
it's tree but version is higher, is if there is a newer version in on
of the included trees it'll prefer it.
plus if you have the old one compiled the deb is still there and it'll
pick it.
but you can do
fink install libxml2-2.5.x-%r and it'll force that one. But you need
the revision. and
On Dec 9, 2003, at 5:25 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is
now, since one of the recent shakeups,
Not that recent : the introduction of 'fink index'
the *reverse*
Martin Costabel wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is
now, since one of the recent shakeups, the *reverse* order of the Trees
line that is used. If true, I would consider this a serious
jfm wrote:
It is somewhat less intuitive, yes _ and further was unannounced, and
undocumented,
while this ordering is really an important config tool for users, and
there were several
previous msgs on the lists pointing out its use. So the change
definitely wasn't done
optimally.
Undocumented
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees important?
This has annoyed me, too. I seem to remember someone saying that it is
now, since one of the recent shakeups, the *reverse* order of the
Trees line that is used. If true, I would
then just add a .1 to the revision that is what i do.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 9-Dec-03, at 1:19 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Benjamin Reed wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Why isn't the order of Trees
Martin:
It will work if you move local/main to be the last item in your Trees line
in fink.conf.
-- Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you
