On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 05:58:00PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2009/9/18 Martin Costabel :
> []
>>> completely over to /opt/X11, which means changing every single package
>>> and forcing everyone to abandon the system X11.
>>>
>>
>> Well, perhaps you can introduce a va
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2009/9/18 Martin Costabel :
[]
>> completely over to /opt/X11, which means changing every single package
>> and forcing everyone to abandon the system X11.
>>
>
> Well, perhaps you can introduce a variable which specifies the X
> location so most packages can be updated to
2009/9/18 David R. Morrison :
>
> On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>> 2009/9/18 Martin Costabel :
>>>
>>> David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Martin,
> I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2009/9/18 Martin Costabel :
>> David R. Morrison wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>
Martin,
I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
in Snow Leopard is already preconf
2009/9/18 Martin Costabel :
> David R. Morrison wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>>> Martin,
>>> I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
>>> in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt
>>> if present (remember th
David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> Martin,
>>I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
>> in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt
>> if present (remember that Jeremy Huddleston is both X11 ma
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Martin,
>I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
> in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt
> if present (remember that Jeremy Huddleston is both X11 maintainer at
> Apple as well as the
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:47:20AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Alexander Hansen wrote:
> []
>> There was an official update of 10.4's X11 via Software Update. And on
>> Leopard a number of the system updates included files in the X11
>> distribution.
>
> I agree with Jack on the fact that the
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
> There was an official update of 10.4's X11 via Software Update. And on
> Leopard a number of the system updates included files in the X11
> distribution.
I agree with Jack on the fact that the xquartz development improved the
"official" X11. The latest softwareupdated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:12:47PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
>> Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> Martin,
>>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:12:47PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert Wyatt wrote:
> > Jack Howarth wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
> >>> Jack Howarth wrote:
> Martin,
> Well, the problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Wyatt wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
>>> Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future so
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:55:49AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
>>> Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future softwar
Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
>> Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> Martin,
>>> Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
>>> of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
>>> update of the X11 components from Apple.
>> Not that it won't o
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Martin,
>> Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
>> of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
>> update of the X11 components from Apple.
>
> Not that it won't or that I wouldn't like to
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Martin,
> Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
> of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
> update of the X11 components from Apple.
Not that it won't or that I wouldn't like to see it, but when has this
ever happened before? --Robert
---
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
update of the X11 components from Apple. This really
the main reason I moved over to MacPorts. A number of
times in the past X11 Xquartz changes have broken pymol
and I don't want to see
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Martin,
>It is a bit extreme to say the Jeremy has gone
> off the deep end with bleeding edge. Completely
I didn't say "off the deep end". What he does is still very valuable,
but in a different way from before. In the long run, it will probably
benefit all users of X11
Martin,
It is a bit extreme to say the Jeremy has gone
off the deep end with bleeding edge. Completely
untrue. Even if the X11 Xquartz was based entirely
on the same code as that in Snow Leopard X11, this
issue of potential incompatibilities would exist.
The change causing the problem is the mov
Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert Wyatt wrote:
>> Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm
>> going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the
>> X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you
Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
> Robert Wyatt wrote:
>> Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm
>> going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the
>> X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it
>> shouldn't matter (in which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Wyatt wrote:
> Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm
> going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the
> X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it
> shouldn't ma
Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm
going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the
X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it
shouldn't matter (in which case I would install the alpha).
--Robert
-
23 matches
Mail list logo
