Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-24 Thread Max Horn
Am 24.10.2011 um 17:58 schrieb David R. Morrison [...] >> >> Dave, >> Any thoughts on the alternative approach as implemented in... >> >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3427243&group_id=17203&atid=317203 >> >> Checking for 10.6 in the path-prefix-10.6 compiler-wrapper and sub

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-24 Thread David R. Morrison
On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: >> >> On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: So at the very least, we should put a news

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-24 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage > >> warning users that fink o

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage > >> warning users that fink o

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/21/11 3:08 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > On 21/10/11 17:05 , David R. Morrison wrote: >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink >> webpage warning users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible >> with Xcode 4.2, and sugges

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 21/10/11 17:05 , David R. Morrison wrote: > So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning > users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and > suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6. We would have needed such a warning against xcode-4.0 since

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage > >> warning users that fink o

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage > >> warning users that fink o

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread David R. Morrison
On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning >> users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and >> suggesting a downgrade

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning > users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and > suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6. > > Another short-term measure would b

[Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread David R. Morrison
So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6. Another short-term measure would be to put a test into fink to check for Xcode 4.2 on 10.6, and warn users tha