Am 24.10.2011 um 17:58 schrieb David R. Morrison
[...]
>>
>> Dave,
>> Any thoughts on the alternative approach as implemented in...
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3427243&group_id=17203&atid=317203
>>
>> Checking for 10.6 in the path-prefix-10.6 compiler-wrapper and sub
On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
So at the very least, we should put a news
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
> >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage
> >> warning users that fink o
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
> >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage
> >> warning users that fink o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/11 3:08 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 21/10/11 17:05 , David R. Morrison wrote:
>> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink
>> webpage warning users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible
>> with Xcode 4.2, and sugges
On 21/10/11 17:05 , David R. Morrison wrote:
> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning
> users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and
> suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6.
We would have needed such a warning against xcode-4.0 since
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
> >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage
> >> warning users that fink o
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:01:58AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
> >> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage
> >> warning users that fink o
On Oct 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning
>> users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and
>> suggesting a downgrade
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:05:38AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
> So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning
> users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and
> suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6.
>
> Another short-term measure would b
So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning
users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and
suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6.
Another short-term measure would be to put a test into fink to check for Xcode
4.2 on 10.6, and warn users tha
11 matches
Mail list logo