I wouldn't imagine so. One reason we use dynamic libraries is that
updates, as long as they're compatible with the prior version,
automatically get used--no rebuild needed. If they're not compatible,
then that's another matter.
Juan M. Courcoul wrote:
> After a MAJOR version change like this,
After a MAJOR version change like this, is there any benefit in recompiling all
source (i.e., pick up new libraries & optimizations, etc.), performance or
security-wise?
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, at 01:44PM, "Randal L. Schwartz" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Alexander" == Alexander Ha
> "Alexander" == Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> If you're on 0.8.1, then do a final "fink selfupdate" with rsync or
Alexander> cvs updating under OS 10.4 to insure you're on fink-0.27.10,
Alexander> install OS 10.5, and then do "fink reinstall fink ; fink
Alexander> se
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> I'm finally about to cut over from 10.4 to 10.5. What will this do
> to my fink install? Do I need to recompile everything? Do I need
> to reinstall? Will it be relatively trivial? Transparent?
>
>
It's relatively straightforward, as long as you're on the 0.8.1
I'm finally about to cut over from 10.4 to 10.5. What will this do
to my fink install? Do I need to recompile everything? Do I need
to reinstall? Will it be relatively trivial? Transparent?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ht
