Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Dave, On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 07:44 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: Maybe you can just open a new "patch tracker" item and post your code there. We'll clean up the various tracker items later. Okay, the patch is uploaded to the patch item 683277. Cheers, Remi ---

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread Justin Hallett
hehe okay I guess I won't :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >I prepared two patch files for init.(c)sh, but I cannot attach them to >the tracker item. I suppose because it is a feature request. I have no >permission to change it. Could anyone of the developers change that? -=[JFH] Justin F. Halle

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread Justin Hallett
I'll fix the sh variant some time in the next two days, but some one will have to translate it to the csh version. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Maybe you can just open a new "patch tracker" item and post your code >there. >We'll clean up the various tracker items later. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread David R. Morrison
Maybe you can just open a new "patch tracker" item and post your code there. We'll clean up the various tracker items later. -- Dave --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! h

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi, I prepared two patch files for init.(c)sh, but I cannot attach them to the tracker item. I suppose because it is a feature request. I have no permission to change it. Could anyone of the developers change that? I define in the init.(c)sh two functions (aliases) addpath and addpath2. They a

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: Remi Mommsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] That's a quick fix for me to do, including the check for the X11 directory as it is mentioned in tracker item 594676. However, I do not know exactly how to handle the feature tracker. Am I supposed to add the patch f

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread David R. Morrison
Remi Mommsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > That's a quick fix for me to do, including the check for the X11 > directory as it is mentioned in tracker item 594676. However, I do not > know exactly how to handle the feature tracker. Am I supposed to add > the patch file to the tracker i

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Ben, On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 11:46 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 11:28 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was just thinking, is it possible to make /sw/bin/init.csh check whether /sw/bin and /sw/sbin are alread

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-07 Thread Ben Hines
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 11:28 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was just thinking, is it possible to make /sw/bin/init.csh check whether /sw/bin and /sw/sbin are already in the path, and if so not add them again? I ask this for several r

[Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-07 Thread John Davidorff Pell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was just thinking, is it possible to make /sw/bin/init.csh check whether /sw/bin and /sw/sbin are already in the path, and if so not add them again? I ask this for several reasons most of them ending up being a shell within a shell with a path