Re: [Fink-devel] lesstif-1:0.95.2-1

Peter Dyballa wrote: > Hello! > > Is there a good reason why lesstif uses a stone-old libfontconfig? > > lesstif-0.95.2/compile > [ -r /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/lesstif.patch ] > ... > ./configure --prefix=/sw --disable-build-12 --disable-build-20 -- > enabl

[Fink-devel] lesstif-1:0.95.2-1

Hello! Is there a good reason why lesstif uses a stone-old libfontconfig? lesstif-0.95.2/compile [ -r /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/lesstif.patch ] ... ./configure --prefix=/sw --disable-build-12 --disable-build-20 -- enable-build-21 --enable-static --

[Fink-devel] lesstif-0.93.18-2 failed to compile

Dear all, I've reinstalled the newest version of fink from sources without any problem. However, when I tried to install kde (bundle-kde-ssl) the compilation failed at lesstif package (lesstif-0.93.18-2) with the following error output: -- ... gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/mwm colormaps.o cursors.o decorat

Re: [Fink-devel] lesstif and XFree86

Torrey, Thanks for the heads up about forthcoming changes. Actually, the fink team had a chance to figure out the lesstif problems in advance of the 4.2 release, because we did have fink packages which were tracking development versions of XFree86. We had identified that there was an intermitte

[Fink-devel] lesstif and XFree86

The lesstif discussion reminded me that I should point out some important changes that are coming soon for XFree86. The XonX project will be releasing a bug fix update soonish to XFree86 from the 4.2 branch. In addition to fixing a few crashing bugs and adding Jaguar compatibility, it will als

Re: [Fink-devel] lesstif and kdebase3-ssl

Hi Justin. The lesstif choice is a temporary thing... lesstif-dev is going away, and once the new lesstif has been tested and I can move it to stable, lesstif-dev will go away completely. The other one, choosing between kdebase3 and kdebase3-ssl, is a well-known shortcoming of fink: it asks you

Re: [Fink-devel] lesstif and kdebase3-ssl

thanks for the quick kleen explination Dave...I understand now... [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Hi Justin. The lesstif choice is a temporary thing... lesstif-dev is >going >away, and once the new lesstif has been tested and I can move it to >stable, >lesstif-dev will go away completely. > >The othe

[Fink-devel] lesstif and kdebase3-ssl

is it just me me or are these two choices odd, first lesstif, and with out doing a fink list to see that the revision on -dev is -4 and the revision on lesstif is -6 I'd never known to use lesstif. Then I told it to install kde-ssl why ask me if i want kdebase3 to have ssl?? Anyhow i don't know

Re: [Fink-devel] lesstif-dev: this time with amaya

Hi Martin. All that is being added is a BuildDepends, so I don't want to bump version numbers. The lesstif package is being built the same way, but now being subdivided into splitoffs. For testing purposes, I only put the new lesstif into unstable for a few days, so I could only add lesstif-dev

[Fink-devel] lesstif-dev: this time with amaya

I just did a fink update-all and the compilation of amaya broke with ../../thotlib/include/thot_gui.h:127: header file 'Xm/MwmUtil.h' not found etc. Turned out this was the same problem someone had yesterday with nedit: If one uses the unstable tree and did regular update-all's, then lesstif-de

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

Hi Martin. Yes, geomview depends on lesstif too, so presumably this is again the same problem. Has anybody had any trouble with any package other than those which depend on lesstif? (I just compiled a list: ddd, nedit, geomview, grace, xephem, mgv, amaya, xbae). Ultimately, it would be nice to

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

"David R. Morrison" wrote: > > If Martin's observation is correct, a concern arises: How was the binary > being distributed by xfree86.org compiled, and is it still equivalent > to fink's, for the purposes of installing other fink packages? Dave, I just wrote about this to the XonX users forum,

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

> > I may have found something. If it's true, it would be trivial to fix: > > I recompiled libXt (in xfree86-4.2.0) with the -flat_namespace > flag, and I think the bug has disappeared. > > The reason that it worked with the libXt from 4.1.0 is that that > one came from a binary distribution compi

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

At 11:10 Uhr -0500 25.01.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >If Martin's observation is correct, a concern arises: How was the binary >being distributed by xfree86.org compiled, and is it still equivalent >to fink's, for the purposes of installing other fink packages? I think they compile it just as

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

At 16:48 Uhr +0100 25.01.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: >On vendredi, janvier 25, 2002, at 02:14 , Max Horn wrote: > >>Let us look at it from this point: It all used to work. Then came >>XFree86 4.2.0 and it stopped to work. Now, what exactly changed to >>make it stop work, I wonder? The only thin

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

If Martin's observation is correct, a concern arises: How was the binary being distributed by xfree86.org compiled, and is it still equivalent to fink's, for the purposes of installing other fink packages? -- Dave ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL P

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

On vendredi, janvier 25, 2002, at 02:14 , Max Horn wrote: > Let us look at it from this point: It all used to work. Then came > XFree86 4.2.0 and it stopped to work. Now, what exactly changed to > make it stop work, I wonder? The only thing that varied where the > XFree libs. So we should mayb

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

At 13:46 Uhr +0100 25.01.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: >Max Horn wrote: > >> So, maybe the suggestion the linker gives us, to use "-bind_at_load" >> might indeed be the way to go. Maybe somebody could test the result >> with this? > >Doesn't help. Even the advice about using -bind_at_load remain

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

> >> So, maybe the suggestion the linker gives us, to use "-bind_at_load" > >> might indeed be the way to go. Maybe somebody could test the result > >> with this? > >> > > > >Max: I tried this with nedit - same error. > > Same error, ok :/ > > What does "otool -L /sw/bin/nedit" give ? And what

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

At 5:25 Uhr -0700 25.01.2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > >> >> >However, the static link editor always >> >produces the same linking as the dynamic linker as long as >> >none of the dynamic shared libraries define the same sym- >> >bol. Different linking can occur only when there is more >

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

Max Horn wrote: > So, maybe the suggestion the linker gives us, to use "-bind_at_load" > might indeed be the way to go. Maybe somebody could test the result > with this? Doesn't help. Even the advice about using -bind_at_load remains there when this option is used. I see another part of the ld m

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

> > > >However, the static link editor always > >produces the same linking as the dynamic linker as long as > >none of the dynamic shared libraries define the same sym- > >bol. Different linking can occur only when there is more > >than one definition of a symbol and the library modules >

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

At 10:21 Uhr +0100 25.01.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: >Max, > >This information is also in the lesstif FAQ at /sw/LessTif/FAQ and >/sw/LessTif/doc/FAQ.html. I remember mentioning this two days ago in the >"XFree86 version and grace" thread on fink-users. The FAQ even mentions >it in the same way w

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

Max, This information is also in the lesstif FAQ at /sw/LessTif/FAQ and /sw/LessTif/doc/FAQ.html. I remember mentioning this two days ago in the "XFree86 version and grace" thread on fink-users. The FAQ even mentions it in the same way we are seeing it, with "DropSiteManager". The problem seems

Re: [Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

Max: I saw this too. The problem is, we are linking the libs in the right order. It looks like the linker is not respecting that. -Jeff On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote: > I searched the net and found this: > > http://www.perchine.com/dyp/x/motif-faq/part9/faq-doc-24.html > > To quote it:

[Fink-devel] Lesstif/nedit/... problems - possibly cause

I searched the net and found this: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/x/motif-faq/part9/faq-doc-24.html To quote it: >269) Why do I get "Error: attempt to add non-widget child "dsm" to parent"? > >[Last modified: May 95] > >Answer: You're linking your libraries in the wrong order. You must link -lXm

[Fink-devel] lesstif

Hm... shouldn't lesstif depend on X11 ? Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourcef