Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2006-01-03 Thread Cian Hughes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yes, I found that out yesterday, I have tracked down the header I was missing (if_var.h) I just need to brush up on how to get the fink build-system to place a file into the source tree after un- compressing it, as opposed to just patching

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2006-01-02 Thread Cian Hughes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, so I'm currently trying to do two things with regard to net_snmp: I need to figure out exactly what apple keeps in /System/Library/ Frameworks/System.framework/PrivateHeaders (which is referenced from

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2006-01-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Cian Hughes wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, so I'm currently trying to do two things with regard to net_snmp: I need to figure out exactly what apple keeps in /System/Library/Frameworks/System.framework/PrivateHeaders (which is referenced from

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-12-24 Thread Martin Costabel
On June 23, 2005 11:08, Cian Hughes wrote: I tried pretty hard with 5.2 patches, but ultimately I got the same broken net-snmp that shiped with tiger, since 10.4.2 has been seeded to developers they are actually obliged to release the patches, I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] so hopefully they

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-12-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Dec 24, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: On June 23, 2005 11:08, Cian Hughes wrote: I tried pretty hard with 5.2 patches, but ultimately I got the same broken net-snmp that shiped with tiger, since 10.4.2 has been seeded to developers they are actually obliged to release the

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-12-24 Thread Cian Hughes
Ok the problem was basically due to school, I was back at it and working rather hard by the time apple released the patch set, hopefully at some stage today i'll fix up the patchset from apple so that it will work for fink and we should be good to go again. Sorry about the delay guys.

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-23 Thread Jeremy Higgs
Thanks, Cian! I was looking around the other day, and I got the impression that the patches for 5.2 were available with the Darwin source. Assuming not much has changed between 5.2 and 5.2.1, they'll probably be quite useful. I guess it also depends on when 10.4.2 is out! Jeremy. On

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-23 Thread Cian Hughes
I tried pretty hard with 5.2 patches, but ultimately I got the same broken net-snmp that shiped with tiger, since 10.4.2 has been seeded to developers they are actually obliged to release the patches, I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] so hopefully they will reply shortly. Regards, Cian Hughes

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-22 Thread Cian Hughes
Just thought I'd point out that the system version is broken, it crashes on some queries, apple have acknowledged this and it will apparently be fixed with 10.4.2, there is potential here that we may end up moving people from a working net-snmp (but old) to a half broken new version. Regards,     

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-22 Thread TheSin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I gotta be honest I don't like the idea of depending on apple for this either. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 22-Jun-05, at 4:21 AM, Cian Hughes wrote: Just thought I'd point out

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-22 Thread Jeremy Higgs
OK, I guess we keep the package, then! Would anyone be prepared to take over the maintainership (?) for net- snmp, in that case? As evidenced by my lack of activity in Fink, I haven't (and still don't have) a great deal of spare time. If there's someone who could maintain net-snmp a better

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-22 Thread Juan Courcoul
If I remember correctly, the Nessus security scanner uses net-snmp libs to check and scan for snmp vulnerabilities. While it should be able to work with the version that comes preinstalled on Tiger (even Panther, but at v5.0.8), still having the SSL-enabled option would be welcome. Of

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-21 Thread Jeremy Higgs
On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote:Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone,I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and  have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions  on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is  actually included

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-21 Thread David R. Morrison
On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote:OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than the system one.Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree with

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-21 Thread Cian Hughes
I tried today to compile net-snmp 5.2.1 on Tiger, an it has not worked properly, I succeeded in patching the new source but it seems from apples patches that it must include some headers from: /System/Library/Frameworks/System.framework/PrivateHeaders , which I for one don't have, I have been

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-21 Thread TheSin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against the system version and provide a good upgrade path. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy

[Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-19 Thread Jeremy Higgs
Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there really a need for

Re: [Fink-devel] net-snmp on Tiger

2005-06-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger, and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given this, is there