On Jan 13,2003 15:44:15 -0600, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 09:33 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 20:34 US/Eastern, Carsten Klapp wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Aside from these directory name issues I have a start on some perl
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 09:33 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 20:34 US/Eastern, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Hi All,
Aside from these directory name issues I have a start on some perl
5.8 info files based on a perl 5.8 info file from the submission
tracker. The modules I
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 20:34 US/Eastern, Carsten Klapp wrote:
Hi All,
Aside from these directory name issues I have a start on some perl 5.8
info files based on a perl 5.8 info file from the submission tracker.
The modules I found so far which need to be recompiled simply have a
new inf
Let me jump back in one more time regarding multiple versions of perl module
packages.
There is a nifty system for emacs versions in Debian, which has been mostly
implemented in Fink (except that not every package follows it), in which
various files are registered as emacs source files and then if
Hi All,
Aside from these directory name issues I have a start on some perl 5.8
info files based on a perl 5.8 info file from the submission tracker.
The modules I found so far which need to be recompiled simply have a
new info file identical to the old one but with a build/depends on the
new
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 12:49 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
A couple of comments on this thread:
1) Fred Sanchez wrote a revised darwin.sh for perl in the fall, which
was
accepted into the perl tree. I believe that it essentially implements
what Chris did. We should follow it. (Links
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 04:02 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
David> 2) By convention, the user-modifiable portion of the Fink tree
David> is /sw/etc. So I think we should create /sw/etc/perl/5.6.0 and
David> /sw/etc/perl/5.8.0 and symlink them back into the /sw/lib/perl
David> trees that
> "David" == David R Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> A couple of comments on this thread:
David> 1) Fred Sanchez wrote a revised darwin.sh for perl in the fall, which was
David> accepted into the perl tree. I believe that it essentially implements
David> what Chris did. We should
A couple of comments on this thread:
1) Fred Sanchez wrote a revised darwin.sh for perl in the fall, which was
accepted into the perl tree. I believe that it essentially implements
what Chris did. We should follow it. (Links to the document were in my
previous post.)
2) By convention, the use
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 11:48 AM, Chris Dolan wrote:
No, that's not right at all. As I discussed with rangerrick on the
submission tracker, Perl already HAS a standard for dealing with
binary incompatible modules. Apple stupidly overrode that mechanism
and we've been dealing with it
Sorry to join this discussion late...
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 09:49 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
So the subject of perl 5.8 came up again on #fink, and I started
taking a look at what we had. Chris Dolan put together a great
package for perl 5.8, but it has one problem -- it still puts
Here are a few relevant posts:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg87083.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06039.html
and, someone who implemented this, more or less...
http://maikimo.net/radio/stories/2002/11/23/buildingperl580modperlapac.html
We also need to look at the "standard" instructions for roll-y
FYI, David Morrison and I talked about this some more in #fink, and
there is more to think about. 1) is trying to find a way to transition
(perhaps /sw/lib/perl/5.6 and /sw/lib/perl/5.8 ?), and 2) is making
things clean bootstrap-wise.
There was post from Fred Sanchez with some ideas on doing
So the subject of perl 5.8 came up again on #fink, and I started taking
a look at what we had. Chris Dolan put together a great package for
perl 5.8, but it has one problem -- it still puts everything in
/sw/lib/perl5 just like our 5.6 packages. The problem is perl 5.6
modules are not binary-
14 matches
Mail list logo
