Re: [Fink-devel] phantom packages

2006-02-06 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:57:19AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Dan, > Argh. I had replaced the copy of the 6.0.2 pdflib info/patch with > ones for 5.0.3. However that was the problem. Fink index doesn't > recognize that you have regressed the version of the info file that > way. I had to get

Re: [Fink-devel] phantom packages

2006-02-06 Thread Jack Howarth
Dan, Argh. I had replaced the copy of the 6.0.2 pdflib info/patch with ones for 5.0.3. However that was the problem. Fink index doesn't recognize that you have regressed the version of the info file that way. I had to get rid of the pdflib.info in my local directory, do a fink index and then I

Re: [Fink-devel] phantom packages

2006-02-06 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:39:20AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Has anyone run into this before? I was building some test pdflib packages > for 6.0.2 in my local/main/finkinfo directory and then decide to deinstall > them and delete the pdflib.info and pdflib.patch that was used to create them.

[Fink-devel] phantom packages

2006-02-06 Thread Jack Howarth
Has anyone run into this before? I was building some test pdflib packages for 6.0.2 in my local/main/finkinfo directory and then decide to deinstall them and delete the pdflib.info and pdflib.patch that was used to create them. However despite using all the options for 'fink cleanup' everytime