Sorry--clicked the wrong radio button during moderation.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA 02139-4213
Though, come to think of it, I was wrong about -devel : I'm sure that
-users and -beginners have restricted postings, and they don't get
spam. Fink-devel is set up for open postings, because it's also the
channel to report feedback on unmaintained packages: no need to make
users subscribe
I don't think that -beginners is restricted either. I don't subscribe to
it, yet I am able to post to it.
-- Dave
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing more.
Download eval WebKing and get a
Am Sonntag, 13.07.03 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
I don't think that -beginners is restricted either. I don't subscribe
to
it, yet I am able to post to it.
Currently only fink-users is restricted to members-only posts (well and
fink-announce / fink-commits are even stronger
You could make it have restricted postings, and set up an
email address that users would send their feedback reports
to, that would forward the message to the list. Would that
reduce the spam?
Or, could you have it moderated for mesages from
non-subscribers only?
- Nicholas Robbins
I didn't know that--it must have just been -users that I'd been blocked
on.
On Sunday, July 13, 2003, at 12:20 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Am Sonntag, 13.07.03 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
I don't think that -beginners is restricted either. I don't
subscribe to
it, yet I am able to post
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, Jul 10, 2003, at 05:10 US/Eastern, David wrote:
Unfortunately we do not have the resources to moderate the list. This
list does become very busy at times and moderating the messages would
introduce a huge delay sometimes. I do think
] On Behalf Of Joe Block
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 7:30 PM
To: Fink Developers
Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
snip
How about making the lists only accept postings from members? And to
anyone with multiple addresses they post from, if you're a developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, Jul 12, 2003, at 21:12 US/Eastern, Alexander K. Hansen
wrote:
The lists only do take postings from subscribers, as far as I can tell
(I've
been burned before by replying using the wrong account).
Hm. I hadn't realized that spammers
i'd like to ask that the list be moderated. i got a digest last week
that was PURE spam. nothing from anyone on the list.
thanx, JP
--
God is dead, now the war shall never end.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
i'd like to ask that the list be moderated. i got a digest last week
that was PURE spam. nothing from anyone on the list.
Yay!
Let me just jump on this bandwagon before it even starts to roll,
and *really strongly* agree.
-- K
On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Kaben Nanlohy wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
i'd like to ask that the list be moderated. i got a digest last week
that was PURE spam. nothing from anyone on the list.
Yay!
Let me just jump on this bandwagon before it even starts to
On Monday, Jun 9, 2003, at 20:32 US/Eastern, Neil Tiffin wrote:
I agree with Chris. I use the beta Eudora with Bayesian filering and
it works great. 20 to 40 junk mails per day correctly identified with
only 3 to 5 per week that get missed and none (so far) incorrectly
identified as junk.
I
Yo folks,
sadly we are getting more and more spam on this list. I have to wonder
if we after all should make it moderated like fink-users, too (that
essentially means that only members can post to the list; non-member
will have to be approved by the list admin).
I am not exactly fond of the
Hi Max. I think it is tolerable for now. Can we encourage SF to hurry
up a bit with the spam filters? It would be better to wait for them,
if we can...
-- Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
If my vote counts, mark it down as an emphatic no. Making things more
cumbersome for humans is not a good way to deal with spam. I use
SpamAssassin on my mailserver and the *only* Fink spam I've ever seen
is when someone on the list has hit reply-all on a spam message.
Pressure on SF.net is
I agree with Chris. I use the beta Eudora with Bayesian filering and
it works great. 20 to 40 junk mails per day correctly identified with
only 3 to 5 per week that get missed and none (so far) incorrectly
identified as junk.
I have not seen one junk mail actually in the fink list.
Neil
17 matches
Mail list logo
