All,
On 21/02/2005, at 6:36 PM, Nigel Stanger wrote:
On 21/2/2005 1:49 AM, Peter O'Gorman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus:
If I recall correctly, the problems come when you have an app that
needs
fontconfig and also needs a lib that uses the new fontconfig, both
the older
fontconfig in
Hey Mike,
On 20/02/2005, at 7:55 PM, Michael wrote:
One Step further on that the fontconfig2-dev package that I molded
for the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree requires freetype-2.1.4 or later, which is
currently not there, and on the freedesktop X libs, if by blockers,
he meant what I am about to say, I
This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or is
it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Mike S
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of
Hi Mike and all,
On 20/02/2005, at 7:31 PM, Michael wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or
is it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Not at all a stupid question I was going to ask the same thing (in
relation to the
Tony Arnold wrote:
Hi Mike and all,
On 20/02/2005, at 7:31 PM, Michael wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or
is it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Not at all a stupid question I was going to ask the same thing (in
relation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael wrote:
| Not at all a stupid question I was going to ask the same thing (in
| relation to the fontconfig2-dev packages). I understand that it forces
| libraries/executables to link against a specific version of a library
| (i.e. in the case of
Tony Arnold wrote:
OK, that's really good to know - I guess what I'd also like to know is
when is this static library situation appropriate? To be honest, I'd
rather build a full fontconfig2 2.2.9x package (dynamic libraries and
all). Is there any reason I shouldn't?
If I recall correctly, the
