[Fink-devel] system-ghostscript issue.

2004-01-20 Thread Andrea Riciputi
Some days ago I sent the following message to the list, but I've got no answer. I repost this hoping someone could help me. Cheers, Andrea. === Begin Original Message === Hi, I've installed Gerben Wierda teTeX distribution with gs 8.0, but now I can't install system-ghostscript because

[Fink-devel] system-ghostscript wants ghostscript7.05

2004-01-16 Thread Andrea Riciputi
Hi, I've installed Gerben Wierda teTeX distribution with gs 8.0, but now I can't install system-ghostscript because it requires gs 7.05. So i can't install all the Fink's packages that require gs. Installing ghostscript 7.05 from fink will hide gs 8.0 (because the different path) and I will end

[Fink-devel] system-ghostscript package for 10.2

2002-10-26 Thread Steve Wall
On Saturday, April 13, 2002, at 07:05 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: About six weeks ago I brought up the issue of making a system-ghostscript package (message reproduced below). Jeff objected (also reproduced below) but I would like to revisit the issue, because there is a forthcoming OzTeX CD

Re: [Fink-devel] system-ghostscript

2002-02-28 Thread Jeff Whitaker
David: I would vote no. The reason I never did this (even though I was asked to several times) is exactly the one you mentioned - these system-foo packages that install symlinks are very inelegant and easily broken. I think we should only do it in those cases (like tetex and XFree86) where the

[Fink-devel] system-ghostscript

2002-02-28 Thread David R. Morrison
I have written a system-ghostscript package, but I am undecided about whether it should be included in fink or not. As some of you know, there is a widely-used teTeX distribution (which accompanies the program TeXShop), and we support this as an alternative with fink's system-tetex package. The