Re: [Fink-devel] Test script errors in matplotlib-pyXY

On 11 Feb 2016, at 1:25 am, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > urllib.error.URLError: certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:645)> > > During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/sw/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 19

[Fink-devel] Test script errors in matplotlib-pyXY

Hi. When building on 10.11/Xcode CL 7.2, I get the following errors during the test script (I only looked at -py27 and -py35): -py27: ERROR: matplotlib.tests.test_backend_ps.test_savefig_to_stringio_with_usetex -- Traceback (mo

[Fink-devel] test for Xcode 4.3

In adjusting the current valgrind packaging to build if Xcode 4.3 or later is present... http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3494843&group_id=17203&atid=414256 I settled on the following construct... if [ `readlink /usr/bin/cc` != "clang" ] then export CC=llvm-gcc-4.2 fi I think

Re: [Fink-devel] Test binutils on 10.6

Also regarding bintuils on darwin, you might check out... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-09/msg00146.html FYI. Jack -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simpl

Re: [Fink-devel] Test binutils on 10.6

On a related issue, we will need to try to get a usable gdb-7.x package into fink when gcc 4.5 is released. The var-tracking-assignment merge into gcc trunk will break debugging exeption handling when using optimization on older gdb releases. Current gdb cvs is broken on all darwin. It will be im

[Fink-devel] Test binutils on 10.6

Hi binutils are broken on 10.6. According to this ticket on macports (http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20197 ) it could be a minor issue. But do not (yet) have 10.6. So, can some test whether this little expansion of the configure part fixes the problem with one of my binutils packages, for e

Re: [Fink-devel] test-pod-pm vs x86_64 10.5 fink

On 19 May 2009, at 02:23, Jack Howarth wrote: > I am finding that while building 'fink -m install gnuplot' > the test-pod-pm build fails as follows... > ... > Is anyone else seeing this with 'fink -m install test-pod-pm' under > x86_64 10.5 fink? I see it even w/o any x86-64 stuff.. Many pkgs

Re: [Fink-devel] test-pod-pm vs x86_64 10.5 fink

On 18/05/2009, at 21:23, Jack Howarth wrote: > I am finding that while building 'fink -m install gnuplot' > the test-pod-pm build fails as follows... (snip) > Is anyone else seeing this with 'fink -m install test-pod-pm' under > x86_64 10.5 fink? Same here (x86_64 10.5). -- monipol -

[Fink-devel] test-pod-pm vs x86_64 10.5 fink

I am finding that while building 'fink -m install gnuplot' the test-pod-pm build fails as follows... Setting up fink-buildlock-test-pod-pm-1.20-1 (2009.05.18-20.18.54) ... gzip -dc /sw/src/Test-Pod-1.20.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xvf - --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions Test-Pod-1.20/ Test-Pod-

Re: [Fink-devel] test llvm-gcc42 packaging

Alexey, Let me know if you have any comments on how I am building llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2. I pretty much followed the approach found in llvm/llvm.spec.in and llvm-gcc-4.2/README.LLVM. Jack On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 05:21:46PM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > On 12/28/07, Jac

Re: [Fink-devel] test llvm-gcc42 packaging

On 12/28/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexey, >I am currently installing both llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2 but > I am not sure if the first is really required. Hopefully > the gfortran support will improve over the next few months. > Here is the comment I got on its current status...

Re: [Fink-devel] test llvm-gcc42 packaging

Alexey, I am currently installing both llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2 but I am not sure if the first is really required. Hopefully the gfortran support will improve over the next few months. Here is the comment I got on its current status... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-December/01196

Re: [Fink-devel] test llvm-gcc42 packaging

Cool! Did you package llvm libraries/headers separately? Or is it just strictly gcc-oriented package? (sorry, didn't have time to look at it) On 12/28/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In case anyone is interested, I posted test > packaging for a llvm-gcc42 package on fink > trackin

[Fink-devel] test llvm-gcc42 packaging

In case anyone is interested, I posted test packaging for a llvm-gcc42 package on fink tracking based on a current svn pull for llvm and llvm-gcc42 branch. The gcc and g++ compilers should be in good shape but the gfortran compiler still needs some work. Jack

[Fink-devel] test

testing, 1 2 3 ... - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/pow

[Fink-devel] test

test mail, please ignore (there seem to be SF.net mailing lists troubles afoot, and I am trying to discover the extent of the problem) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay pane

[Fink-devel] Test, trying to reach fink-devel

It seems I can't send any mails to fink mailing lists anymore -- sorry if you get this testmail multiple times. Cheers, Max --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 grea

[Fink-devel] test for post lag... 20040130 15:41 EST {eom}

--- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

Sure. The change which Max is suggesting only affects running the test suite while fink is being bootstrapped, and also during the first time the user upgrades to fink-0.18.0 (or whatever release this code becomes part of). After that, the test suite will be run each time the user installs fink.

[Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

Dear fink-devel, I've added code which causes the fink test suite to be run every time you bootstrap or inject fink. This required the introduction of three new essential packages in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and earlier: file-spec-pm, test-simple-pm, and test-harness-pm. Please let me know if you en

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 David R. Morrison wrote: Thanks for the suggestion, Max, I'll look into modifying t/00compile to make this work (although I'm a bit scared to touch that!). personally I think that the whole purpouse of the test suit is defied if we cannot or bet

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

I agree that making these packages essential is not a great solution. In fact, if we make the test code conditional on the presence of the Test:: stuff, then we can just add these packages to the bootstrap when needed (like with storable-pm560). Thanks for the suggestion, Max, I'll look into modif

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

P.S. If you are running on 10.2, you should install test-simple-pm by hand before updating fink from CVS HEAD. The "essential" versions of the new packages are present during the bootstrap, but haven't yet been added to the unstable trees. ---

Re: [Fink-devel] test suite now implemented

Am Donnerstag, 04.12.03 um 16:03 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: P.S. If you are running on 10.2, you should install test-simple-pm by hand before updating fink from CVS HEAD. The "essential" versions of the new packages are present during the bootstrap, but haven't yet been added to the unstab

[Fink-devel] test

test -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Commu