On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 21:26, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Hmmm... Yeah, I could do it in tetex-texmf... It's tricky, though; I only
> want to make the tetex-base script fail if its an old version of tetex-base
> that's installed. OK, I will try some more...
Some suggestions on how to do this:
Hmmm... Yeah, I could do it in tetex-texmf... It's tricky, though; I only
want to make the tetex-base script fail if its an old version of tetex-base
that's installed. OK, I will try some more...
Thanks,
Dave
---
This SF.net email is spons
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 17:46, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Sorry, I said it wrong before: the error is in the old PreRemove script,
> not the PostRemove script.
>
> The problem is, the very first thing which dpkg does upon updating a
> package is to execute the *old* prerm script. I would never hav
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 04:40 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that the removal of files is happening in PostRemove,
> > outside
> > of dpkg's control. But if you can think of an alternate way to solve
> > this
> > prob
On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 04:40 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The problem is that the removal of files is happening in PostRemove,
outside
of dpkg's control. But if you can think of an alternate way to solve
this
problem, I would love to hear it.
Have one of your scripts edit the var/lib/d
On Feb 21,2003 15:04:39 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 05:14, Martin Costabel wrote:
>> On lundi, fév 17, 2003, at 08:48 Europe/Paris, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>> []
>> > [0] Reading the postinst, this seems to be when a certain file is
>> > missing
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 05:14, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On lundi, fév 17, 2003, at 08:48 Europe/Paris, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> []
> > [0] Reading the postinst, this seems to be when a certain file is
> > missing. What ever happened to this file? And there are certainly
> > better ways to deal w
Title: Re: [Fink-devel] tetex upgrade
problems
Dear Finkers,
I've been lurking on the list for a while because I have been
working on trying to get a number of packages ported over to fink and
am having some difficulties (along with some success), and was hoping
that someone could
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>
> On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 11:00 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
> >
> > Hmm? dpkg -r huh? When it says "reinstall", do that: "fink reinstall
> > tetex-texmf"
>
> dpkg -r, fink install or dpkg -r, dpkg -i re-installs too.
If you use dpkg, you have to
On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 11:00 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
Hmm? dpkg -r huh? When it says "reinstall", do that: "fink reinstall
tetex-texmf"
dpkg -r, fink install or dpkg -r, dpkg -i re-installs too.
Actually, come to thing of it, just dpkg -i would, too.
(I probably did it the dpkg way be
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 11:48 PM, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Then, to top it all off, tetex-base postinst asked me to re-install
tetex-texmf[0]
A dpkg -r later, it's time for fink install lyx. Hope it works...
Hmm? dpkg -r huh? When it says "reinstall", do that: "fink reinstall
On lundi, fév 17, 2003, at 08:48 Europe/Paris, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
[]
[0] Reading the postinst, this seems to be when a certain file is
missing. What ever happened to this file? And there are certainly
better ways to deal with this than asking for a manual re-install...
I don' think so. T
[Sorry, I didn't keep build logs...]
I just did a fink update-all, and had a much less-than-pleasant
experience with tetex. Well, actually, the lyx build is still running,
so I'm still having it. Hopefully it all works now...
This experience involved nice things like having to use dpkg --force
13 matches
Mail list logo
