David R. Morrison wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2007, at 6:34 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>> Can we have a percent expansion, perhaps %{dist} to represent the
>> value
>> of Distribution: so that it can be used elsewhere in the .info
>> (like for
>> determining build settings)?
>
> I think it wi
On Jun 18, 2007, at 6:34 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> David R. Morrison wrote:
>> Dear Fink developers,
>>
>> I have added a Distribution field to fink packages which involve
>> python or perl.
>
> But it can be used for any package, not just perl/pythonmods, right?
Right.
>
>> As some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Dave,
>What features do we have available in fink currently to allow
> the distribution (10.4 vs 10.5) to be tested at build time? It would
> be very useful to be able to case such things as ConfigureParms to
> have different
David R. Morrison wrote:
> Dear Fink developers,
>
> I have added a Distribution field to fink packages which involve
> python or perl.
But it can be used for any package, not just perl/pythonmods, right?
> As some of you will recall, we are sharing files between fink's 10.4
> and 10.5 distr
Dave,
What features do we have available in fink currently to allow
the distribution (10.4 vs 10.5) to be tested at build time? It would
be very useful to be able to case such things as ConfigureParms to
have different values depending on whether the package was being
built under Tiger or Leopar
Dear Fink developers,
I have added a Distribution field to fink packages which involve
python or perl.
As some of you will recall, we are sharing files between fink's 10.4
and 10.5 distributions. Also, fink's 10.5 distribution does not
contain python 2.3, perl 5.8.1, or perl 5.8.4.
The ad
