Re: [Fink-devel] Doxygen doesn't need to depend on graphviz or latex

2008-09-25 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
James Bunton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:28:51PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:55 PM, James Bunton wrote: >> >>> As far as I can tell doxygen does not need to depend on graphviz or >>> LaTeX. Removing these two dependencies would make the dependency list >>> of man

Re: [Fink-devel] Doxygen doesn't need to depend on graphviz or latex

2008-09-25 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Sep 25, 2008, at 9:37 AM, James Bunton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:28:51PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:55 PM, James Bunton wrote: >> >>> As far as I can tell doxygen does not need to depend on graphviz or >>> LaTeX. Removing these two dependencies would make

Re: [Fink-devel] Doxygen doesn't need to depend on graphviz or latex

2008-09-25 Thread James Bunton
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:28:51PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:55 PM, James Bunton wrote: > >> As far as I can tell doxygen does not need to depend on graphviz or >> LaTeX. Removing these two dependencies would make the dependency list >> of many packages significantly sm

Re: [Fink-devel] Doxygen doesn't need to depend on graphviz or latex

2008-09-23 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:55 PM, James Bunton wrote: > As far as I can tell doxygen does not need to depend on graphviz or > LaTeX. Removing these two dependencies would make the dependency > list of > many packages significantly smaller. Graphviz in particular pulls in a > lot of other packages. >