Re: [Fink-devel] libpng

2008-11-05 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 06 Nov 2008, at 04:11, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > Does upstream have anything to say about why they > don't want to incorporate it ? OK _ (at least part of) the discussion seemsto be here : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php? msg_name=3.0.6.32.20070420132821.012dd8e8%40mail.

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng

2008-11-05 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 06 Nov 2008, at 02:45, David R. Morrison wrote: > Here's what I managed to find out about APNG: > > http://littlesvr.ca/apng/ > > It looks like a patch that is no longer being maintained by its author > and has not been integrated into the main line of libpng code. How > should we proceed? N

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng

2008-11-05 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
David R. Morrison wrote: > Here's what I managed to find out about APNG: > > http://littlesvr.ca/apng/ > > It looks like a patch that is no longer being maintained by its author > and has not been integrated into the main line of libpng code. How > should we proceed? That is correct. The l

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng

2008-11-05 Thread Daniel Macks
File bug against seamonkey upstream? Seems poor for them to require unreleased code in an external dependency (and at best they should be forced to know they're doing so). Or does seamonkey have an on-board libpng source and upstream will just say "use the one we ship"? dan On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 a

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng

2008-11-05 Thread David R. Morrison
Here's what I managed to find out about APNG: http://littlesvr.ca/apng/ It looks like a patch that is no longer being maintained by its author and has not been integrated into the main line of libpng code. How should we proceed? -- Dave On Nov 4, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Jean-François Mertens

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng not in 0.5.2

2003-06-20 Thread David R. Morrison
That document from Apple's site is a bit misleading, in a number of respects. For example, you don't need to install zlib under 10.2 because it is already there! In the Fink project, we updated to the latest version of libpng a while back, and the new Fink package is called "libpng3". -- Dave

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng not in 0.5.2

2003-06-20 Thread David
On Freitag, Juni 20, 2003, at 07:23 Uhr, Craig Hotchkiss wrote: I'm trying to configure my php install with the libpng library based on the instructions from http://developer.apple.com/internet/macosx/php.html and have run into an error (libpng.(also) not found.) where it appears that libjpg i

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng / libpng3 FAQ

2003-03-02 Thread Alexander Hansen
I can do it. Let me make sure I put down an answer that is useful: 1) The problem only afflicts unstable, correct? 2) The problem is being fixed. 3) Users should start by updating those packages that are complaining. 4) If the update doesn't solve the problem, let the maintainer know. On Mon, 3

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng, libpng3 - bounce bounce bounce

2003-02-06 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 10:06 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: About half of the packages I install replace libpng3 with libpng. And the other half replace libpng back with libpng3. I wish they'd make up their mind. Which is it? And why are these two packages so easily replaced with

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng list

2003-01-30 Thread Max Horn
At 14:44 Uhr -0500 30.01.2003, David R. Morrison wrote: Sure, but I think there are really two things going on. 1) If you have an old imlib and are building a package which links libpng3, there is no way you can ever build it correctly. Could somebody explain to me why exactly this is a problem

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng list

2003-01-30 Thread David R. Morrison
Sure, but I think there are really two things going on. 1) If you have an old imlib and are building a package which links libpng3, there is no way you can ever build it correctly. 2) If you've updated imlib, then once in a while, due to a bug in fink, you'll have a problem with libpng vs. libpng

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng list

2003-01-30 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 02:28 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I think actually it is packages that use imlib that we need to be more concerned about, than libpng. Any package using both imlib and libpng should be updated to libpng3, and also should have a versioned dependency on the late

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng list

2003-01-30 Thread David R. Morrison
I think actually it is packages that use imlib that we need to be more concerned about, than libpng. Any package using both imlib and libpng should be updated to libpng3, and also should have a versioned dependency on the latest imlib from unstable. -- Dave ---

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng

2003-01-21 Thread Alexander Hansen
Seems vitriolic. It looked like there was some confusion with respect to the cause of the problem, so I posted a clarification including the imlib version numbers. On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 13:38, David R. Morrison wrote: > In case anyone wants to follow the thread over at macosxhints forum, here > i

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng and shlibs -- request for action

2002-02-10 Thread David R. Morrison
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Acereda_Maci=E1?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, February 10, 2002, at 05:08 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > > > The libpng library has been updated recently in a way that is not > > backward-compatible. Our new shared libraries policy can handle this > > Where can