On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 05:50 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
ghx still doesn't build.
As I said before, the problems you are encountering have been fixed for
months now, in ghx-0.1.39-2.
-- Finlay
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
At 18:21 Uhr + 16.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 05:50 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
ghx still doesn't build.
As I said before, the problems you are encountering have been fixed
for months now, in ghx-0.1.39-2.
but that is not in stable. You might want to
At 9:50 Uhr -0800 16.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Thanks Max! My updated report on the main branch:
gnome-games 1.4.0.3-4: installation fails when chown is not in the path,
which it normally is not. gnome-games should refer to the full
path of the binary
There seem to still be
We don't want to be sued. If a packages doesn't have a license field,
it won't get into the bindist. If it is under a restrictive license
which forbids binary redistribution, it won't get into the bindist.
If a package possibly infringes patents (like libgif does with the
unisys patent), it
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote:
With fink, for every package there is an .info file (and possibly a
.patch file, too). Fink then uses the data from this .info file to
retrieve the source tarball(s), expand them, patch them, compile
everything, and then package it into a .deb (this is
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 09:33 pm, Max Horn wrote:
Oh and to mention one more difference: count the number of active
debian developers. The count the total number of active fink
developers. Compare the numbers. Think.
And compare the
here is what I get after installing storable-pm
make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib
-I/System/Library/Perl/darwin -I/System/Library/Perl -e 'use Test::Harness
qw(runtests $verbose); $verbose=0; runtests @ARGV;' t/*.t
t/1_XMLin...ok
Oh, and another weird thing, several -pm packages I have built were
erroring like crazy, then I tried building in a clean shell, and they
suddenly worked, oh and I did try that for this one, too, but I will try
again.
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 06:13 , Justin Hallett wrote:
you seem
At 10:14 Uhr +1100 17.01.2002, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
On 17/1/02 5:54 AM, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 9:50 Uhr -0800 16.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Thanks Max! My updated report on the main branch:
gnome-games 1.4.0.3-4: installation fails when chown is not in the path,
which
On 17/1/02 10:29 AM, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The version of xfce in stable is old... I have compiled the unstable version
of xfce fine, and I have had successful reports, but someone complained of a
bus error, I think.
Bit late to move it to stable now, though, to be included in
Kyle == Kyle Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kyle I found a way to detect if Storable.pm exists, at runtime. Pulled
Kyle this from the xml-simple-pm package, it was in one of the test scripts.
Kyle eval ( require Storable; };
Kyle if ($INC{'Storable.pm'}) $somevar{'storable'} = 'True';
That is actually what I was thinking, but I am not very good at perl, so
I was not sure that that method would work, and I saw the other in a
test script that I knew did work, so I was inclined to go with what I
know, and leave the refining to others who knew more.
Thanks for the tip,
Kyle
I wonder if there is any reason why we should keep the xfree86-server
package? Granted, it's supposed to be a stable base compared to
rootless, but rootless runs rock stable for me, too.
What do you think?
Max
--
---
Max Horn
Software Developer
Well, some of us don't like downloading 56 MB CVS snapshots :)
How about making xfree86-rootless a special case and keeping it
constantly in sync with stable and the bindist? The apt version is only
3 MB, which is a LOT better.
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 09:44 PM, Max Horn wrote:
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
