On Sunday, December 22, 2002, at 11:48 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
I did this because it has become clear that quite a bit of testing
still
needs to be done, and some existing Fink packages will need to be
modified,
For example, which packages still don't work? gd? You fixed it.
TOT on
yup and I sent positive feedback as soon as i tried it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>For example, which packages still don't work? gd? You fixed it.
-=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett
-=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc.
-=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Well, unlikely.. current cvs also has some rather severe splitoff bugs
(they don't work), i am pretty sure caused by RangerRick's recent
patch. I was going to suggest releasing current fink (with isystem)
once those are fixed. But its
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 07:46 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Well, unlikely.. current cvs also has some rather severe splitoff
bugs (they don't work), i am pretty sure caused by RangerRick's
recent patch. I was going to sugges
Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, December 22, 2002, at 11:48 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> > I did this because it has become clear that quite a bit of testing
> > still
> > needs to be done, and some existing Fink packages will need to be
> > modified,
> >
>
> For example
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 08:25 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
to every package (with one caveat, mentioned below), which would cause
the package to follow the old default behavior under the new system.
It would then be up to individual maintainers to modify this if they
wanted.
That wou
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 08:25 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Well, I hadn't heard of problems with the other patches to fink, and in
fact Justin has been lobbying pretty hard to get some repaired version
released that handles the dependency problems.
The bugs are open on the bug trac
I'm not sure if I made clear what the fvwm2 problem was.
Sure, there was one set of problems that was easy to spot and was cured
by reverting the -isystem flag.
But there is another problem, which I haven't actually tracked down, in
which some of the files in the fvwm2 package don't build when th
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 08:53 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
But there is another problem, which I haven't actually tracked down, in
which some of the files in the fvwm2 package don't build when the
LIBRARY_PATH/DYDL_LIBRARY_PATH variables are set instead of the LDFLAGS
variable.
Yeah,
Ben: If you and Justin will verify that you have built every package
currently in stable with the -isystem flag enabled, and there are no
problems with any of them, then I don't object to including that flag
in the next release. (I hadn't heard anyone make as strong a claim
as that about having t
I think we should make this patch too for the next fink, just gets rid
of some annoying warnings with 5.8.
-Ben
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)
Date: Thu Nov 28, 2002 7:08:47 AM US/Pacific
To: Paul Gaborit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11 matches
Mail list logo
