Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread David R. Morrison
I think it would be useful to have a configuration option governing the index behavior. Sometimes, I am doing a lot of editing of info files, and then I might want to turn the current indexing behavior on (instead of always having to type "fink index foo.info"). Other times, I am mainly compiling

[Fink-devel] Re: experimental doxygen update

2003-02-16 Thread jfm
On Tuesday, Feb 11, 2003, at 17:34 Europe/Brussels, David R. Morrison wrote: I've now implemented this, with two packages which you can find in the CVS module "experimental/dmrrsn": doxygen-1.2.18-6 and fancyhdr-2.1-1. I'd like to get those thoroughly tested before they are added to fink, to m

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread jfm
On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 02:43 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: ... we could add a "fink index foo.info" command, which would add the specified .info file(s) to the index. This way, you could just (re)index the files you are working on, avoiding having to do full indexing too often. Yes _

[Fink-devel] Package submission: pyobjc-0.8-2.info

2003-02-16 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I just uploaded pyobjc-0.8-2.info to the package submission tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/ index.php?func=detail&aid=687511&group_id=17203&atid=414256 I have not actually set out to learn Objective-C yet - something I'm reserving

Re: [Fink-devel] I want Gimp in English!

2003-02-16 Thread Ludwin
If you use tcsh, try this: unsetenv LANG gimp That should launch gimp in english It works, thanks! --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread Max Horn
At 8:09 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote: I think it would be useful to have a configuration option governing the index behavior. Sometimes, I am doing a lot of editing of info files, and then I might want to turn the current indexing behavior on (instead of always having to type "fi

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 04:44 pm, Max Horn wrote: Note that you can always enforce a full reindexing by "fink index". I don't think that enabling an auto-reindex option, then run fink, then disable it again, is easier, rather it seems to be way more complicated :-) Apparently my sc

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:44 AM, Max Horn wrote: At 8:09 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote: I think it would be useful to have a configuration option governing the index behavior. Sometimes, I am doing a lot of editing of info files, and then I might want to turn the cu

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread Max Horn
At 16:59 Uhr +0100 16.02.2003, jfm wrote: On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 02:43 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: ... we could add a "fink index foo.info" command, which would add the specified .info file(s) to the index. This way, you could just (re)index the files you are working on, avoiding hav

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:52 AM, Max Horn wrote: * We have to record the location of the matching .info file (note that it could even exist in multiple places, e.g. local/stable/unstable, and in different versions) No * New .info files can't be found this way; thus you won't pi

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread Ben Hines
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 09:19 AM, Ben Hines wrote: No, those are not concerns. You miss the point of my suggestion. There is only one (or more if expanded by shell metacharacters) "matching info file" with my method: Perhaps it will make more sense with a full path: "fink install

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread Max Horn
At 9:08 Uhr -0800 16.02.2003, Ben Hines wrote: On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:44 AM, Max Horn wrote: At 8:09 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote: I think it would be useful to have a configuration option governing the index behavior. Sometimes, I am doing a lot of editing of in

Re: [Fink-devel] cctools virtual package

2003-02-16 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 12:45 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 03:18 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Ben Reed will use this in qt3 and kde, to detect whether folks have upgraded to the December 2002 tools or not. Yup, just put together some test qt3 and kde pa

Re: [Fink-devel] index behaviour change (post 0.11.x)

2003-02-16 Thread jfm
On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 17:52 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: This has at least these two problems: * We have to record the location of the matching .info file (note that it could even exist in multiple places, e.g. local/stable/unstable, and in different versions) * New .info files can

[Fink-devel] Re: CVS: fink/perlmod/Fink Services.pm,1.37,1.38

2003-02-16 Thread Carsten Klapp
Nice patch! My informal tests show that md5 is about two times faster than md5sum on my g4 Dual-450. Carsten Only 4 pairs of tests with a 700 Megabyte file. Times are underlined below, about 35s for md5 versus 1min 18s for md5sum. [localhost:~] carsten% time md5 r-divx.avi ; time md5sum r-di

[Fink-devel] evolution dependency collisions

2003-02-16 Thread thomas kotzian
i wanted to install evolution but there are other packages installed that depend on gtkhtml and evolution wants to have gtkhtml1.1 installed. here is the trace: dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/ gtkhtml1.1_1.1.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb dpkg: considering removing

Re: [Fink-devel] evolution dependency collisions

2003-02-16 Thread Max Horn
At 20:13 Uhr +0100 16.02.2003, thomas kotzian wrote: i wanted to install evolution but there are other packages installed that depend on gtkhtml and evolution wants to have gtkhtml1.1 installed. here is the trace: dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/ gtkhtml1.1_1

[Fink-devel] Re: CVS: fink/perlmod/Fink Services.pm,1.37,1.38

2003-02-16 Thread Max Horn
At 14:02 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, Carsten Klapp wrote: Nice patch! My informal tests show that md5 is about two times faster than md5sum on my g4 Dual-450. That's not the motivation for the test, though (and the MD5ing is hardly an important bottleneck or anything :-). The true justification for

[Fink-devel] doxygen - reports about link errors

2003-02-16 Thread thomas kotzian
Hello! I got reports (about 4-5) that doxygen 1.2.18-{4,5} can't link to png. I don't have problems on my system. some people have tried it with jul 2002 and dec 2002 dev tools and osx 10.2.3 and 10.2.4. even recompiling png doesn't help on affected systems. c++ -o ../bin/doxygen ../objects/ma

Re: [Fink-devel] evolution dependency collisions

2003-02-16 Thread Alexander Hansen
Actually, there is a runtime issue here too. If you wind up switching gtkhtml1.1 to gtkhtml, then you can't open/reply to messages in Evolution 1.2.x--there is an error message saying words to the effect of "HTML component couldn't be activated" In my case the prs that gnucash depends on gnome-c

Re: [Fink-devel] doxygen - reports about link errors

2003-02-16 Thread Martin Costabel
thomas kotzian wrote: Hello! I got reports (about 4-5) that doxygen 1.2.18-{4,5} can't link to png. I don't have problems on my system. some people have tried it with jul 2002 and dec 2002 dev tools and osx 10.2.3 and 10.2.4. even recompiling png doesn't help on affected systems. c++ -o ../bi

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Documentation revision -- switch to .cshrc?

2003-02-16 Thread Neal Parikh
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 07:55 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 07:30 PM, Max Horn wrote: I do not mind that much if we change to .tcshrc from a techincal point of view. What I fear, though, is that we also will have some troubles in the transition perio

Re: [Fink-devel] evolution dependency collisions

2003-02-16 Thread Max Horn
At 17:27 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, Alexander Hansen wrote: Actually, there is a runtime issue here too. If you wind up switching gtkhtml1.1 to gtkhtml, then you can't open/reply to messages in Evolution 1.2.x--there is an error message saying words to the effect of "HTML component couldn't be activat

[Fink-devel] gtkhtml

2003-02-16 Thread Max Horn
I just wanted to build gtkhtml to look into the issues mentioned in the "evolution dependency collisions" thread. I was quite surprised by the result: it wants to install both the gnome 1 and gnome 2 packages, e.g. both gnome-vfs-dev and gnome-vfs2-dev. That seems to be very odd to me. Especial

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Documentation revision -- switch to .cshrc?

2003-02-16 Thread Alexander Hansen
There _is_ a FAQ entry on this--although in it I said to put the source /sw/bin/init.csh in .tcshrc if it were present, rather than to source .cshrc . http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#fink-not-found On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Neal Parikh wrote: > > On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 0

[Fink-devel] guile 1.6.3

2003-02-16 Thread Edward Cheng
i have an urgent need for guile 1.6, but cannot get it to compile on OSX 10.2.3, December 2002 Developer Tools installed. anyone got ideas? errors from make look like: Making all in libguile ./guile-snarf -o alist.x alist.c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libguile-ltdl -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-

[Fink-devel] tetex upgrade problems

2003-02-16 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
[Sorry, I didn't keep build logs...] I just did a fink update-all, and had a much less-than-pleasant experience with tetex. Well, actually, the lyx build is still running, so I'm still having it. Hopefully it all works now... This experience involved nice things like having to use dpkg --force