-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Samstag, März 8, 2003, at 06:37 Uhr, Alexander Strange wrote:
The following unstable packages have bad checksums:
Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/Net-IP-Match-0.01.tar.gz
of package net-ip-match-pm-0.01-1 is incorrect.
Fixed. Thank
I removed freetype2(-hinting) from the Depends line of librsvg, eel and
gnome-print. (Fixed bug #642021)
At the sametime, I added it to the BuildDepends line of following
packages,
anjuta-0.9.99-4
evolution-1.2.2-2
gtranslator-0.43-2
gtkhtml1.1-1.1.7-2
---
Masanori Sekino
mailto:[EMAIL
You could make part of your script email these to the maintainers.
-Ben
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 09:37 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
The following unstable packages have bad checksums:
Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/Net-IP-Match-0.01.tar.gz
of package net-ip-match-pm-0.01-1 is
The german computer magazine c't (http://heise.de/ct) has an article
about Fink in its latest issue 6/2003, p264+265. Sadly it's not online,
but see http://heise.de/ct/inhverz/search.shtml?T=finkSuchen=suchen.
It's actually quite a glowing review, and presents many nice details.
It also
MD5 of libxml seems fine for me.
On 2003.3.8, at 02:37 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
The following unstable packages have bad checksums:
Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/Net-IP-Match-0.01.tar.gz
of package net-ip-match-pm-0.01-1 is incorrect.
Checksum of tarball
Alexander Strange wrote:
[]
Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/siag-3.5.2.tar.gz of
package siag-3.5.2-5 is incorrect.
Does your script perhaps report a bad md5sum also when the source
download fails? The copies of siag-3.5.2.tar.gz I can get my hands on
have the right checksum, but it
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 08:10 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander Strange wrote:
[]
Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/siag-3.5.2.tar.gz of package
siag-3.5.2-5 is incorrect.
Does your script perhaps report a bad md5sum also when the source
download fails? The copies of
Am Sonntag, 09.03.03 um 02:10 Uhr schrieb Martin Costabel:
Alexander Strange wrote:
[]
Checksum of tarball /Users/feanor/sw/src/siag-3.5.2.tar.gz of package
siag-3.5.2-5 is incorrect.
Does your script perhaps report a bad md5sum also when the source
download fails? The copies of
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 08:37 PM, Alexander Strange wrote:
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 08:24 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Yes libxml and siag have correct MD5s for me here, too.
Max
I get these MD5s:
80169faebe7bca9fd531b53b6c5d3ed5 in the .info file
624519aaf9149142cd87f79e1ac4a58c in the
Does anyone object to me updating the links on the right side to be
something more human-readable? We seem to regularly get e-mails
requesting packages and such, and I suspect it's because things like
Package request tracker don't mean anything to a normal user.
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:39, Max Horn wrote:
the 5.0-rc - 4.999-rc sounds like shit
5.0alpha 5.0beta 5.0rc 5.0rel
Someone on debian-devel came up with that once. I think I've remembered
it right.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
11 matches
Mail list logo
