this might do as well for you:
edit /sw/etc/fink.conf so it includes the following lines:
KeepBuildDir: true
KeepRootDir: true
this will keep both: the build directory (where you'd type make) and
the install directory (where fink installs the files before building a
deb)
hope that helps
mathi
dear fink developers
if someone please could add tha new jpegoptim (1.2.2) to fink. to old
version (1.1) contains an error that can result in data loss. thank you
very much,
mathias
jpegoptim-1.2.2-1.info
Description: Binary data
to correct myself:
of course another 'fink rebuild foo' will delete the source directory.
if you want fink only to do parts of
unpacking/patching/compiling/installing you would have to edit
Engine.pm. this is NOT really recommended but i tell you anyway...
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Engine.pm
look fo
Hi Mathias
I think it would be most efficient to add your info file to the package
submission tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=414256&group_id=17203
(linked from the fink homepage.) It wont get lost there...
Chris.
On Montag, März 17, 2003, at 10:31 Uhr, mathias meyer wrote:
de
Am Samstag, 15.03.03 um 23:54 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
A Java SDK virtual pkg seems to be needed. Apple's 1.4.1 update did
not install the headers, causing any package that uses
/Library/Java/Home/include or /Library/Java/Home/Headers to fail for
any user that installed Java 1.4.1 from software u
FYI David, we (the project leaders) are already pursuing an entry into
the Apple Design Awards, in either the open source or the server
category. I do not believe the innovation aware is really compatible
with Fink.
Max
---
This SF.net emai
Am Montag, 17.03.03 um 10:40 Uhr schrieb mathias meyer:
to correct myself:
of course another 'fink rebuild foo' will delete the source directory.
if you want fink only to do parts of
unpacking/patching/compiling/installing you would have to edit
Engine.pm. this is NOT really recommended but i
Sorry about the length of the subject! It does describe something that
the proposed PATH setup application would want to deal with, however.
I've forwarded the message that brought this on:
-Forwarded Message-
From: Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [F
Hi Max.
Well, my idea is that we do something fairly sensible, but then offer the
user the chance to see the file we changed and edit it some more if they
want.
This non-CLI setup is mainly intended for people who haven't used the
command line much and so will likely only have the default setup.
Am Montag, 17.03.03 um 23:04 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
Hi Max.
Well, my idea is that we do something fairly sensible, but then offer
the
user the chance to see the file we changed and edit it some more if
they
want.
Yeah I understood that was your intention.
This non-CLI setup is mainly
Max Horn wrote:
[]
If you are trying to get to the angle that the people who will want to
use our tool will not have a complex .tcshrc / .cshrc - then I will
disagree. Yes, 99% of them won't have one, but I am willing to bet high
amounts of money that there are those who have a complex .cshrc. E
Hi Martin. Thanks for making the script. A couple of comments:
1) If the user is running csh not tcsh and doesn't have any dotfiles,
then I think we want to create .cshrc NOT .tcshrc. Also, if
there are no existing dotfiles then creating .cshrc is OK for
tcsh users as well. And
On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 02:38 PM, Max Horn wrote:
Am Montag, 17.03.03 um 23:04 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
[SNIP]
One thing which Ben Reed and I were talking about in this regard is
that
it would be good to put in a little check in /sw/bin/init.csh to stop
it from getting loaded twice
I want to package jimi (a java class library needed from fop). Everyone
can download the source from java.sun.com, but they hide the file
through redirects. so i cannot find the file. i could mirror the source
somewhere but the license doesn't allow it. can i tell the user to
download the sourc
Am Freitag, 14.03.03 um 21:13 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
[...]
case yes) check if "source %p/sw/init.csh" is already in the
.tcshrc
How exactly could this be done? Considering that scripts can include
arbitrary other scripts? Also, the "source" statement could b
Hi,
That's not what I want. I just want to be able to recompile everything and
then install everything in one step. That would make the development cycle
much easier. Mathias pretty much understood what I wanted to do (skip the
unpacking & patching steps).
I am beginning to wonder if I am misunde
Hi folks,
Currently all Fink team members at SourceForge.net have full write
access to the entire CVS repository. This imposes some problems on us:
since everybody gets full power, we can only allow people in that we
"trust" to not mess up anything by accident, or whatever else. For this
reaso
That's what the .info and .patch files are for. When a package gets
modified, the porting number gets changed (e.g. foo.1.2-3 goes to
foo.1.2-4). THis is how to do it quasi-automatically with fink.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Adam Skwersky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That's not what I want. I just want to be abl
18 matches
Mail list logo
