[Fink-devel] How to handle package with changing source tarball?

Dear Fink Developers Richard Graul has submitted a package that includes a source tarball that changes very frequently. He therefore thinks we should not include a md5sum for that tarball. See: Could anyon

Re: [Fink-devel] pm dependencies

jfm said: : : There is, if I'm not mistaken, a problem of correct deps : for a multi-perl fink installation. : Recall that some pm's (roughly, those installing a bundle) : must have "Type: Perl x.y.z" in their info file, and be built : with perlx.y.z, to be usable with perlx.y.z _ and those packag

Re: [Fink-devel] How to handle package with changing source tarball?

On Montag, Juli 28, 2003, at 01:15 Uhr, TheSin wrote: we normally include the tar ball in mirror:sourceforge:/fink/ How is this done? Where could the package maintainer submit the tarball? On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 01:01 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote: Could anyone enlighten me what would be

Re: [Fink-devel] How to handle package with changing source tarball?

we normally include the tar ball in mirror:sourceforge:/fink/ On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 01:01 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote: Could anyone enlighten me what would be the correct procedure in such a case? --- This SF.Net email sponsored by:

Re: [Fink-devel] How to handle package with changing source tarball?

normally this needs to be disscussed with a release manager like drm, rangerrick or fingolfin, then they upload it to incoming on sourforge and one of the release managers needs to add it to the project releases, then in 24 hours or less it'll be available on all the sourceforge mirrors. On Mo

Re: [Fink-devel] pm dependencies

On Monday, Jul 28, 2003, at 12:18 Europe/Brussels, Daniel Macks wrote: I'm not sure I understand, so this paragraph could be irrelevant, but... That sounds like it would mean that every perl I have would have the same modules installed. That might be nice in that no matter which perl I used, I'

Re: [Fink-devel] How to handle package with changing source tarball?

When we need to host the tarball for a package at fink's site, it has to be placed there by one of the fink project leaders. If the package in question is ready to go, otherwise, please let me know the details and I can get the tarball to the fink site. By the way, this assumes that the source i

[Fink-devel] new version

I know that this has been covered here before, but I searched this list on sourceforge and could not find the answer. I want to update sockstat 1.6.2.5 to 1.6.2.6. They changed the source on the ftp server and now the current sockstat package in fink is broken. I have a new sockstat-1.6.2.6-1.

[Fink-devel] splitoff essential package feedback?

I'd like to get some feedback on the "splitoff" versions of the essential packages bzip2, gettext, libiconv, and ncurses, which were introduced to the unstable tree around 10 days ago. Did the update go smoothly for people? Is anyone aware of any problems? (There was one user with a problem on IR

Re: [Fink-devel] splitoff essential package feedback?

Hi Dave, For me the update went very smoothly. I haven't notice any problems. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Remi On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 01:15 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I'd like to get some feedback on the "splitoff" versions of the essential packages bzip2, gettext,

Re: [Fink-devel] splitoff essential package feedback?

On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 04:15 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: I'd like to get some feedback on the "splitoff" versions of the essential packages bzip2, gettext, libiconv, and ncurses, which were introduced to the unstable tree around 10 days ago. no problems for me. - Koen. -

[Fink-devel] creating a package to link against gnome 1.x (vs 2.x)

Hello, I'm working on creating a package for gnotime, an excellent time tracking solution. I think I ran into a problem because my package linked against the Gnome 2.x code instead of 1.x, causing a runtime error. Could anyone provide a pointer on how I can be sure my package is built against Gn

RE: [Fink-devel] splitoff essential package feedback?

There was an update? Just kidding--I didn't notice any problems. Alexander K. Hansen Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David R. Morrison Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:15 PM To: [EMAI

RE: [Fink-devel] creating a package to link against gnome 1.x (vs 2.x)

On my system, the following packages require gnome-libs-shlibs, which is at version 1.4, so presumably it's GNOME1: gnome-libs-dev depends on gnome-libs-shlibs (= 1.4.2-5). gtranslator depends on gnome-libs-shlibs. gnome-libs depends on gnome-libs-shlibs (= 1.4.2-5). dia depends on gnome-libs-s

[Fink-devel] dbi-pm580 fails test

Hi, I tried to install dbi-pm580 and got the following error (+ many similar ones) during the test-phase: make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 perl5.8.0 "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01basics.dyld: perl5.8.0 Undefined symbols: _PERL_UNUSED_

[Fink-devel] OpenNap-0.44, 0.45, -NG

Title: OpenNap-0.44, 0.45, -NG Hi, All-- I was hoping to get some help with the .info files for each of these packages. I am a total newbie...hence the need for help :) I need to add some commands at the end of the install process which will create a new directory and then copy and rename some

Re: [Fink-devel] splitoff essential package feedback?

Am Dienstag, 29.07.03 um 03:34 Uhr schrieb Alexander K. Hansen: There was an update? Just kidding--I didn't notice any problems. Same here. Max --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-comme

Re: [Fink-devel] OpenNap-0.44, 0.45, -NG

Hi, Rohan-- This looks perfect! Except, I do believe all the various versions look for their config files in the /share/opennap location...that's why I put them there. Also, I think you meant users, not servers at the bottom... If I make those corrections and just add what you've written as is