This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or is
it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Mike S
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of I
Hi Mike and all,
On 20/02/2005, at 7:31 PM, Michael wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or
is it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Not at all a stupid question – I was going to ask the same thing (in
relation to the fontconfig2-
Tony Arnold wrote:
Hi Mike and all,
On 20/02/2005, at 7:31 PM, Michael wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but when is it necessary, or is it, or
is it even possible, to use static linked libraries in a fink package?
Not at all a stupid question – I was going to ask the same thing (in
relation
On 20 Feb 2005, at 01:44, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
./configure --prefix=/sw
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether
Ok, now I have a new error. I installed a fresh copy of XDarwin,
figuring that it was something I did to that directory, now the package
builds fine, but dpkg fails with:
(Reading database ... 11260 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking gtk+2 (from .../gtk+2_2.6.2-3_darwin-power
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael wrote:
|> Not at all a stupid question – I was going to ask the same thing (in
|> relation to the fontconfig2-dev packages). I understand that it forces
|> libraries/executables to link against a specific version of a library
|> (i.e. in the cas
Hi Peter,
On 20/02/2005, at 11:38 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
|> Not at all a stupid question – I was going to ask the same thing
(in
|> relation to the fontconfig2-dev packages). I understand that it
forces
|> libraries/executables to link against a specific version of a
library
|> (i.e. in the c
Tony Arnold wrote:
OK, that's really good to know - I guess what I'd also like to know is
when is this static library situation appropriate? To be honest, I'd
rather build a full fontconfig2 2.2.9x package (dynamic libraries and
all). Is there any reason I shouldn't?
If I recall correctly, the p
> From: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Fink-devel] gtk+2
> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 02:46:42 -0800
>
> Ok, now I have a new error. I installed a fresh copy of XDarwin,
> figuring that it was something I did to that directory, now the package
> build
On Feb 20, 2005, at 4:53 AM, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
On 20 Feb 2005, at 01:44, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
./configure --prefix=/sw
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
check
On 20 Feb 2005, at 14:58, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Ah---I didn't realize that pybibliographer isn't a Fink package.
There's a couple of things to do:
was that based on something I wrote? It is a fink package isn't it?
1) Check the config.log file in the pybibliographer build directory
to s
Ah---I didn't realize that pybibliographer isn't a Fink package.
There's a couple of things to do:
1) Check the config.log file in the pybibliographer build directory
to see what file it can't find.
2) Make sure you've set your environment up as per
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-
Now that the fink versions on Jaguar and Panther are different, it would
be nice if the old dumpinfo bug could be fixed. Here is the bug:
% fink dumpinfo fink
Information about 3328 packages read in 7 seconds.
infofile: /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/base/fink.info
package: fink
version: 0
Am I correct in thinking that this means it is trying to use python
form /usr/bin, see line Python='/usr/bin/python' and
configure:1659: found /usr/bin/python
configure:1672: result: /usr/bin/python
configure:1688: checking python requirements
configure:1715: result: no
configure:1717: error:
On 20 Feb 2005, at 21:07, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that this means it is trying to use python
form /usr/bin, see line Python='/usr/bin/python' and
configure:1659: found /usr/bin/python
configure:1672: result: /usr/bin/python
configure:1688: checking python requireme
On Feb 20, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
On 20 Feb 2005, at 21:07, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that this means it is trying to use python
form /usr/bin, see line Python='/usr/bin/python' and
configure:1659: found /usr/bin/python
configure:1672: result: /usr
On Feb 20, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Feb 20, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
On 20 Feb 2005, at 21:07, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that this means it is trying to use
python form /usr/bin, see line Python='/usr/bin/python' and
configure:
Following up, I get the same thing:
...
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for python... /usr/bin/python
checking python requirements... no
configure: error: error in python modules dependencies: No module
named pygtk
### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 1
Removing build lock
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 01:54:32PM -0800, Trevor Harmon wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Alexander Strange wrote:
> >
> >The appropriate thing to do would be to make all the seperate packages
> >Provide wxwidgets, and then Conflict/Replace each other if necessary.
Having them all Provide a c
Sorry to be so slow to respond here: I've only just begun to track down
what's happening.
When I compile this, I have no problem because the python setup script
does not find a value for DISPLAY in the environment, and so reports
"cannot test gtk [no DISPLAY]". My first guess was that this
20 matches
Mail list logo
